PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMRIX vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMRIX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MainStay Moderate Allocation Fund (MMRIX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMRIX achieves a 8.16% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 9.75% return. Over the past 10 years, MMRIX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 7.29%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.77% annualized return.


MMRIX

1D
0.78%
1M
1.57%
YTD
8.16%
6M
7.84%
1Y
17.87%
3Y*
11.81%
5Y*
6.21%
10Y*
7.29%

VOO

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.08%
YTD
9.75%
6M
9.30%
1Y
26.77%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
15.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMRIX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MMRIX
MainStay Moderate Allocation Fund
8.16%11.38%8.84%13.65%-13.76%12.21%13.01%18.20%-8.86%12.11%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
9.75%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between MMRIX and VOO is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.94

The correlation between MMRIX and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMRIX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMRIX
MMRIX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
MMRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
MMRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMRIX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay Moderate Allocation Fund (MMRIX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MMRIXVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.39

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

3.02

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.14

13.58

-1.44

MMRIX vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMRIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMRIX and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MMRIX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMRIX drawdown since its inception was -35.91%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMRIX and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMRIXVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.91%

-33.99%

-1.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.40%

-8.90%

+2.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.10%

-18.69%

+6.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.40%

-24.52%

+4.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.34%

-33.99%

+9.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

-1.74%

+1.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.48%

-3.68%

-0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

1.98%

-0.52%

Volatility

MMRIX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MainStay Moderate Allocation Fund (MMRIX) is 3.31%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 4.60%. This indicates that MMRIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMRIXVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

4.60%

-1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.93%

9.73%

-2.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.39%

12.39%

-4.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.46%

16.90%

-6.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.23%

18.05%

-5.82%

MMRIX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMRIX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MMRIX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

MMRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.10%, more than VOO's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MMRIX
MainStay Moderate Allocation Fund
5.10%5.51%6.88%0.60%5.92%9.74%5.89%4.16%7.98%3.23%1.73%5.26%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.04%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, MMRIX and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VOO has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to MMRIX (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMRIX dropped -35.91% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMRIX and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer