MMMA vs. IWLG

Last updated Jun 7, 2026

MMMA (NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF) and IWLG (NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MMMA is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by NYLI, while IWLG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by NYLI. Both are actively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MMMA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IWLG.

Performance

MMMA vs. IWLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF (MMMA) and NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF (IWLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMMA achieves a 3.03% return, which is significantly higher than IWLG's 1.37% return.

MMMA

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 3.03%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IWLG

• 1D: -4.05%
• 1M: -0.67%
• YTD: 1.37%
• 6M: 0.17%
• 1Y: 11.05%
• 3Y*: 21.65%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMMA vs. IWLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MMMA NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF	3.03%	0.33%
IWLG NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF	1.37%	0.91%

Correlation

The correlation between MMMA and IWLG is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025	0.32

Return for Risk

MMMA vs. IWLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWLG

IWLG Risk / Return Rank: 20
IWLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
IWLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
IWLG Omega Ratio Rank: 22
IWLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
IWLG Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMMA vs. IWLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF (MMMA) and NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF (IWLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MMMA	IWLG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.72	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.79	1.05	+0.74

Drawdowns

MMMA vs. IWLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMMA drawdown since its inception was -2.79%, smaller than the maximum IWLG drawdown of -23.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMMA and IWLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	MMMA	IWLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.79%	-23.19%	+20.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-19.45%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.27%	-5.34%	+5.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.60%	-4.57%	+3.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	6.39%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MMMA	IWLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.84%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.06%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.15%	16.81%	-12.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.15%	21.04%	-16.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.15%	21.04%	-16.89%

MMMA vs. IWLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMMA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IWLG's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

MMMA vs. IWLG - Dividend Comparison

MMMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, while IWLG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
IWLG NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	1.34%	0.01%	0.05%
MMMA NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF	1.96%	0.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MMMA and IWLG in my portfolio?

MMMA and IWLG have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MMMA or IWLG?

On fees, MMMA is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MMMA or IWLG?

MMMA is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IWLG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MMMA or IWLG?

MMMA has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.00% for IWLG.

What is the main difference between MMMA and IWLG?

MMMA is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while IWLG is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for MMMA and 0.50% for IWLG.