MMMA vs. INTM

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

MMMA (NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF) and INTM (Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.

Performance

MMMA vs. INTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF (MMMA) and Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF (INTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMMA achieves a 3.55% return, which is significantly higher than INTM's 2.61% return.

MMMA

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 0.35%
• 6M: 2.73%
• YTD: 3.55%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

INTM

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.60%
• 6M: 2.12%
• YTD: 2.61%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMMA vs. INTM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MMMA NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF	3.55%	0.35%
INTM Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF	2.61%	0.49%

Correlation

The correlation between MMMA and INTM is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025	0.42

Return for Risk

MMMA vs. INTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF (MMMA) and Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF (INTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

MMMA vs. INTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMMA drawdown since its inception was -2.79%, which is greater than INTM's maximum drawdown of -2.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMMA and INTM.

Drawdown Indicators

	MMMA	INTM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.79%	-2.65%	-0.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.57%	-0.41%	-0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.53%	-0.45%	-0.08%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MMMA	INTM	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.95%	2.50%	+1.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.95%	2.50%	+1.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.95%	2.50%	+1.45%

MMMA vs. INTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MMMA and INTM have an expense ratio of 0.35%.

Dividends

MMMA vs. INTM - Dividend Comparison

MMMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, less than INTM's 2.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
INTM Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF	2.91%	1.15%
MMMA NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF	2.30%	0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MMMA and INTM in my portfolio?

MMMA and INTM have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MMMA or INTM?

Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MMMA or INTM?

MMMA and INTM have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MMMA or INTM?

INTM has the higher dividend yield at 2.91%, compared with 2.30% for MMMA.

What is the main difference between MMMA and INTM?

They also come from different issuers: NYLI and Invesco.