PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMM vs. SO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MMM vs. SO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 3M Company (MMM) and The Southern Company (SO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMM achieves a -0.15% return, which is significantly lower than SO's 10.02% return. Over the past 10 years, MMM has underperformed SO with an annualized return of 4.58%, while SO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.77% annualized return.


MMM

1D
0.26%
1M
8.84%
YTD
-0.15%
6M
-5.36%
1Y
13.32%
3Y*
26.46%
5Y*
2.22%
10Y*
4.58%

SO

1D
1.22%
1M
2.86%
YTD
10.02%
6M
13.62%
1Y
7.91%
3Y*
14.19%
5Y*
12.20%
10Y*
10.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMM vs. SO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MMM
3M Company
-0.15%26.36%46.13%-3.33%-29.63%4.85%2.77%-4.29%-16.90%34.90%
SO
The Southern Company
10.02%9.47%21.72%2.21%8.24%16.34%0.63%51.65%-3.75%2.42%

Correlation

The correlation between MMM and SO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1981

0.27

The correlation between MMM and SO shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.27 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MMM:

$84.35B

SO:

$106.03B

EPS

MMM:

$5.17

SO:

$3.92

PE Ratio

MMM:

30.65

SO:

23.98

PS Ratio

MMM:

3.41

SO:

3.47

PB Ratio

MMM:

25.85

SO:

2.86

Total Revenue (TTM)

MMM:

$25.02B

SO:

$30.17B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MMM:

$9.89B

SO:

$13.01B

EBITDA (TTM)

MMM:

$5.28B

SO:

$14.44B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMM vs. SO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMM
MMM Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
MMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMM Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
MMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMM Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

SO
SO Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
SO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SO Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMM vs. SO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 3M Company (MMM) and The Southern Company (SO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MMMSODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.10

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.61

0.53

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.35

1.24

+0.11

MMM vs. SO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMM Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is comparable to the SO Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMM and SO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MMM vs. SO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMM drawdown since its inception was -59.10%, which is greater than SO's maximum drawdown of -38.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMM and SO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMMSODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.10%

-38.43%

-20.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.77%

-14.99%

-3.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.87%

-14.99%

-7.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.34%

-23.28%

-30.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.10%

-38.43%

-20.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.45%

-3.95%

-4.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.10%

-6.87%

-9.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.48%

6.39%

+2.09%

Volatility

MMM vs. SO - Volatility Comparison

3M Company (MMM) and The Southern Company (SO) have volatilities of 6.23% and 6.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMMSODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.23%

6.03%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.26%

13.07%

+6.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.96%

16.21%

+9.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.30%

18.67%

+9.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.53%

21.96%

+4.57%

Dividends

MMM vs. SO - Dividend Comparison

MMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than SO's 3.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MMM
3M Company
1.91%1.82%16.27%5.49%4.97%3.33%3.36%3.26%2.86%2.00%2.49%2.72%
SO
The Southern Company
3.60%3.37%3.47%3.96%3.78%3.82%4.13%3.86%5.42%4.78%4.52%4.60%

Financials

MMM vs. SO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between 3M Company and The Southern Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B6.00B7.00B8.00B9.00B20222023202420252026
6.03B
8.40B
(MMM) Total Revenue
(SO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MMM vs. SO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between 3M Company and The Southern Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
40.7%
46.5%
Portfolio components
MMM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, 3M Company reported a gross profit of 2.46B and revenue of 6.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.7%.

SO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Southern Company reported a gross profit of 3.90B and revenue of 8.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.5%.

MMM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, 3M Company reported an operating income of 1.40B and revenue of 6.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.2%.

SO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Southern Company reported an operating income of 2.02B and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.0%.

MMM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, 3M Company reported a net income of 653.00M and revenue of 6.03B, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.

SO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Southern Company reported a net income of 1.36B and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in a net margin of 16.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MMM and SO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MMM has higher volatility (6.23%) compared to SO (6.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMM dropped -59.10% vs SO's -38.43%.

SO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.49 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMM and SO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer