MMM vs. LPG
MMM (3M Company) and LPG (Dorian LPG Ltd.) are both stocks. MMM operates in Conglomerates (Industrials), while LPG operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 10 years, MMM returned 4.58%/yr vs 29.41%/yr for LPG. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MMM vs. LPG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMM achieves a -0.15% return, which is significantly lower than LPG's 94.53% return. Over the past 10 years, MMM has underperformed LPG with an annualized return of 4.58%, while LPG has yielded a comparatively higher 29.41% annualized return.
MMM
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 8.18%
- YTD
- -0.15%
- 6M
- -5.36%
- 1Y
- 11.41%
- 3Y*
- 26.46%
- 5Y*
- 2.22%
- 10Y*
- 4.58%
LPG
- 1D
- 3.79%
- 1M
- 14.01%
- YTD
- 94.53%
- 6M
- 93.10%
- 1Y
- 108.89%
- 3Y*
- 37.14%
- 5Y*
- 47.82%
- 10Y*
- 29.41%
MMM vs. LPG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMM 3M Company | -0.15% | 26.36% | 46.13% | -3.33% | -29.63% | 4.85% | 2.77% | -4.29% | -16.90% | 34.90% |
LPG Dorian LPG Ltd. | 94.53% | 9.75% | -37.80% | 171.42% | 109.62% | 12.71% | -21.25% | 165.52% | -29.08% | 0.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMM and LPG is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2014 | 0.19 |
The correlation between MMM and LPG shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MMM:
$84.35B
LPG:
$1.93B
MMM:
$5.17
LPG:
$4.54
MMM:
30.65
LPG:
9.95
MMM:
3.41
LPG:
4.00
MMM:
25.85
LPG:
1.69
MMM:
$25.02B
LPG:
$481.51M
MMM:
$9.89B
LPG:
$415.02M
MMM:
$5.28B
LPG:
$279.22M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMM vs. LPG — Risk / Return Rank
MMM
LPG
MMM vs. LPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 3M Company (MMM) and Dorian LPG Ltd. (LPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MMM | LPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.42 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.61 | 4.38 | -3.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.35 | 9.39 | -8.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MMM vs. LPG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMM drawdown since its inception was -59.10%, smaller than the maximum LPG drawdown of -78.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMM and LPG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMM | LPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.10% | -78.31% | +19.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.77% | -24.99% | +6.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.87% | -62.89% | +40.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.34% | -62.89% | +9.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.10% | -62.89% | +3.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.45% | -5.30% | -3.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.10% | -42.68% | +26.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.48% | 11.64% | -3.16% |
Volatility
MMM vs. LPG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for 3M Company (MMM) is 6.23%, while Dorian LPG Ltd. (LPG) has a volatility of 17.04%. This indicates that MMM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LPG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMM | LPG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.23% | 17.04% | -10.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.26% | 30.44% | -11.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.96% | 39.81% | -13.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.30% | 43.43% | -15.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.53% | 48.29% | -21.76% |
Dividends
MMM vs. LPG - Dividend Comparison
MMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, less than LPG's 6.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LPG Dorian LPG Ltd. | 6.53% | 10.07% | 16.41% | 9.12% | 29.02% | 7.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MMM 3M Company | 1.91% | 1.82% | 16.27% | 5.49% | 4.97% | 3.33% | 3.36% | 3.26% | 2.86% | 2.00% | 2.49% | 2.72% |
Financials
MMM vs. LPG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between 3M Company and Dorian LPG Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MMM and LPG have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LPG has higher volatility (17.04%) compared to MMM (6.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMM dropped -59.10% vs LPG's -78.31%.
LPG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MMM and LPG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer