MMLG vs. FITZ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MMLG (First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF) and FITZ (Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MMLG charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for FITZ.

Performance

MMLG vs. FITZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF (MMLG) and Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MMLG

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 5.53%
• YTD: 5.17%
• 6M: 3.84%
• 1Y: 15.59%
• 3Y*: 21.53%
• 5Y*: 8.42%
• 10Y*: —

FITZ

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMLG vs. FITZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
MMLG First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF	0.17%
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF	-1.66%

Correlation

The correlation between MMLG and FITZ is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	0.30

Return for Risk

MMLG vs. FITZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMLG

MMLG Risk / Return Rank: 22
MMLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
MMLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
MMLG Omega Ratio Rank: 24
MMLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
MMLG Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMLG vs. FITZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF (MMLG) and Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF (FITZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MMLG	FITZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.86	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.26	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.79	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.26	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MMLG	FITZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	-7.29	+7.75

Drawdowns

MMLG vs. FITZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMLG drawdown since its inception was -45.97%, which is greater than FITZ's maximum drawdown of -1.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMLG and FITZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	MMLG	FITZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.97%	-1.97%	-44.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.89%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.57%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.97%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.79%	-1.97%	+0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.35%	-1.08%	-13.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.91%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MMLG	FITZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.35%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.02%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.21%	8.74%	+9.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.94%	8.74%	+16.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.53%	8.74%	+15.79%

MMLG vs. FITZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMLG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FITZ's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

MMLG vs. FITZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither MMLG nor FITZ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FITZ Fitz-Gerald Must Have Portfolio ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MMLG First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MMLG and FITZ in my portfolio?

MMLG and FITZ have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MMLG or FITZ?

On fees, FITZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MMLG or FITZ?

FITZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MMLG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MMLG or FITZ?

MMLG and FITZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between MMLG and FITZ?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Nicholas. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for MMLG and 0.75% for FITZ.