MMKT vs. LSAT

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

MMKT (Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF) and LSAT (Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF) are both Money Market funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MMKT returned 3.72% vs 18.38% for LSAT. Their 0.03 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MMKT charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for LSAT.

Performance

MMKT vs. LSAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT) and Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMKT achieves a 2.05% return, which is significantly lower than LSAT's 18.37% return.

MMKT

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.30%
• 6M: 1.75%
• YTD: 2.05%
• 1Y: 3.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.01%

LSAT

• 1D: 1.28%
• 1M: 1.21%
• 6M: 17.77%
• YTD: 18.37%
• 1Y: 18.38%
• 3Y*: 11.21%
• 5Y*: 7.47%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LSAT Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF	$125.15K	$115.93K	$109.16K
MMKT Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF	$508.57K	$519.13K	$740.73K

MMKT vs. LSAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MMKT Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF	2.05%	4.13%	1.22%
LSAT Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF	18.37%	-1.54%	-1.50%

Correlation

The correlation between MMKT and LSAT is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024	0.03

Return for Risk

MMKT vs. LSAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MMKT

MMKT Risk / Return Rank: 100
MMKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MMKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
MMKT Omega Ratio Rank: 100
MMKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MMKT Martin Ratio Rank: 100

LSAT

LSAT Risk / Return Rank: 55
LSAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
LSAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
LSAT Omega Ratio Rank: 52
LSAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
LSAT Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MMKT vs. LSAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT) and Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MMKT	LSAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	17.13	1.41	+15.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	65.58	2.13	+63.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	17.69	1.25	+16.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	149.89	2.33	+147.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	940.27	5.50	+934.78

MMKT vs. LSAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMKT Sharpe Ratio is 17.13, which is higher than the LSAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMKT and LSAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MMKT vs. LSAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMKT drawdown since its inception was -0.04%, smaller than the maximum LSAT drawdown of -20.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMKT and LSAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	MMKT	LSAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.04%	-20.48%	+20.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.02%	-7.94%	+7.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.25%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.48%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.77%	+1.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-5.42%	+5.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.00%	3.35%	-3.35%

Volatility

MMKT vs. LSAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT) is 0.06%, while Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that MMKT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MMKT	LSAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.06%	4.48%	-4.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.13%	9.91%	-9.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22%	13.08%	-12.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.23%	16.27%	-16.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.23%	16.71%	-16.48%

MMKT vs. LSAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMKT has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than LSAT's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

MMKT vs. LSAT - Dividend Comparison

MMKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than LSAT's 1.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
LSAT Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF	1.60%	1.90%	1.31%	1.85%	0.36%	3.44%	0.30%
MMKT Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF	3.65%	3.98%	1.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MMKT and LSAT in my portfolio?

MMKT and LSAT have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MMKT or LSAT?

LSAT has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to MMKT (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMKT dropped -0.04% vs LSAT's -20.48%.

Which ETF is better, MMKT or LSAT?

On 1-year performance, LSAT leads with 18.38% vs 3.72% for MMKT. On fees, MMKT is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, MMKT has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MMKT or LSAT?

Over the 1-year period, LSAT has performed better with a 18.38% return vs 3.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MMKT or LSAT?

MMKT is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for LSAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MMKT or LSAT?

MMKT has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 1.60% for LSAT.

What is the main difference between MMKT and LSAT?

They also come from different issuers: Texas Capital and Redwood. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MMKT and 0.99% for LSAT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MMKT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.13 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.