PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMKT vs. GMMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMKT vs. GMMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT) and iShares Government Money Market ETF (GMMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with MMKT at 2.05% and GMMF at 2.05%.


MMKT

1D
0.02%
1M
0.30%
6M
1.75%
YTD
2.05%
1Y
3.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.01%

GMMF

1D
0.01%
1M
0.29%
6M
1.72%
YTD
2.05%
1Y
3.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.78M$2.09M$3.24M
$508.57K$519.13K$740.73K

MMKT vs. GMMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MMKT and GMMF is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2025

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMKT vs. GMMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MMKT
MMKT Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
MMKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMKT Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
MMKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMKT Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

GMMF
GMMF Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
GMMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMMF Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
GMMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMMF Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MMKT vs. GMMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT) and iShares Government Money Market ETF (GMMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MMKTGMMFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-73.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

17.69

40.34

-22.65

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

149.89

250.39

-100.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

940.27

2,203.33

-1,263.05

MMKT vs. GMMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMKT Sharpe Ratio is 17.13, which is comparable to the GMMF Sharpe Ratio of 18.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMKT and GMMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MMKT vs. GMMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMKT drawdown since its inception was -0.04%, which is greater than GMMF's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMKT and GMMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMKTGMMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.04%

-0.03%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.02%

-0.01%

-0.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Volatility

MMKT vs. GMMF - Volatility Comparison

Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF (MMKT) has a higher volatility of 0.06% compared to iShares Government Money Market ETF (GMMF) at 0.05%. This indicates that MMKT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMKTGMMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.06%

0.05%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.13%

0.13%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22%

0.20%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.23%

0.24%

-0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.23%

0.24%

-0.01%

MMKT vs. GMMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MMKT and GMMF have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MMKT vs. GMMF - Dividend Comparison

MMKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than GMMF's 3.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
GMMF
iShares Government Money Market ETF
3.54%3.45%0.00%
MMKT
Texas Capital Government Money Market ETF
3.65%3.98%1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


MMKT and GMMF have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MMKT has higher volatility (0.06%) compared to GMMF (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMKT dropped -0.04% vs GMMF's -0.03%.

On 1-year performance, GMMF leads with 3.73% vs 3.72% for MMKT. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GMMF has performed better with a 3.73% return vs 3.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MMKT and GMMF have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

MMKT has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 3.54% for GMMF.

They also come from different issuers: Texas Capital and iShares.

GMMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (18.78 vs 17.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMKT and GMMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer