PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LSAT vs. QQQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


LSATQQQ
YTD Return22.77%25.63%
1Y Return30.20%33.85%
3Y Return (Ann)7.05%9.83%
Sharpe Ratio2.602.12
Sortino Ratio3.652.79
Omega Ratio1.451.38
Calmar Ratio3.532.71
Martin Ratio15.749.88
Ulcer Index2.14%3.72%
Daily Std Dev12.98%17.31%
Max Drawdown-20.48%-82.98%
Current Drawdown-0.76%-0.37%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between LSAT and QQQ is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

LSAT vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, LSAT achieves a 22.77% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 25.63% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
10.10%
13.67%
LSAT
QQQ

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LSAT vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSAT has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.20% expense ratio.


LSAT
Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF
Expense ratio chart for LSAT: current value at 0.99% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.99%
Expense ratio chart for QQQ: current value at 0.20% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.20%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LSAT vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LSAT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LSAT, currently valued at 2.60, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.002.60
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LSAT, currently valued at 3.65, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.65
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LSAT, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.45
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LSAT, currently valued at 3.53, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.53
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LSAT, currently valued at 15.74, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0015.74
QQQ
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for QQQ, currently valued at 2.12, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.002.12
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for QQQ, currently valued at 2.79, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.79
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for QQQ, currently valued at 1.38, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.38
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for QQQ, currently valued at 2.71, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.71
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for QQQ, currently valued at 9.88, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.009.88

LSAT vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSAT Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSAT and QQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.60
2.12
LSAT
QQQ

Dividends

LSAT vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

LSAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than QQQ's 0.59% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LSAT
Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF
1.51%1.85%0.36%3.44%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ
0.59%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%1.41%1.02%

Drawdowns

LSAT vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSAT drawdown since its inception was -20.48%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSAT and QQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.76%
-0.37%
LSAT
QQQ

Volatility

LSAT vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) is 3.94%, while Invesco QQQ (QQQ) has a volatility of 4.91%. This indicates that LSAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.94%
4.91%
LSAT
QQQ