LSAT vs. QQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ).
LSAT and QQQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LSAT is an actively managed fund by Redwood. It was launched on Oct 27, 2020. QQQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Mar 10, 1999.
Performance
LSAT vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LSAT vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSAT Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF | 1.40% | -1.54% | 18.16% | 13.64% | -12.99% | 25.10% | 20.47% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | -5.93% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 11.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSAT achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's -5.93% return.
LSAT
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- -1.78%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- -2.97%
- 1Y
- 0.13%
- 3Y*
- 9.21%
- 5Y*
- 5.57%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- 3.39%
- 1M
- -4.84%
- YTD
- -5.93%
- 6M
- -3.62%
- 1Y
- 23.68%
- 3Y*
- 22.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.88%
- 10Y*
- 18.85%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LSAT vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSAT has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LSAT vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
LSAT
QQQ
LSAT vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LSAT | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.01 | 1.05 | -1.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.13 | 1.63 | -1.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.23 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.07 | 1.88 | -1.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.21 | 6.95 | -6.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LSAT | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 | 1.05 | -1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.58 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.37 | +0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between LSAT and QQQ is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
LSAT vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
LSAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than QQQ's 0.49% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSAT Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF | 1.87% | 1.90% | 1.31% | 1.85% | 0.36% | 3.44% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.49% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Drawdowns
LSAT vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSAT drawdown since its inception was -20.48%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSAT and QQQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSAT | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.48% | -82.97% | +62.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.54% | -12.62% | -0.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.48% | -35.12% | +14.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.77% | -8.98% | +2.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.68% | -32.99% | +27.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.22% | 3.41% | +0.81% |
Volatility
LSAT vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) is 4.05%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 6.51%. This indicates that LSAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LSAT | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 6.51% | -2.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.35% | 12.77% | -3.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.26% | 22.67% | -5.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.28% | 22.39% | -6.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.90% | 22.25% | -5.35% |