PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMDEX vs. FOKFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MMDEX vs. FOKFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Praxis Growth Index Fund (MMDEX) and Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio (FOKFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMDEX achieves a 5.38% return, which is significantly lower than FOKFX's 20.99% return.


MMDEX

1D
-2.11%
1M
-3.22%
YTD
5.38%
6M
3.97%
1Y
21.43%
3Y*
21.99%
5Y*
11.96%
10Y*
17.74%

FOKFX

1D
-3.24%
1M
-1.04%
YTD
20.99%
6M
19.99%
1Y
44.55%
3Y*
29.92%
5Y*
15.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MMDEX vs. FOKFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MMDEX
Praxis Growth Index Fund
5.38%18.34%33.44%29.82%-28.23%28.12%33.23%18.16%
FOKFX
Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio
20.99%20.30%34.58%43.48%-32.32%25.95%47.52%17.08%

Correlation

The correlation between MMDEX and FOKFX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2019

0.96

The correlation between MMDEX and FOKFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MMDEX vs. FOKFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMDEX
MMDEX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
MMDEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMDEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMDEX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MMDEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMDEX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

FOKFX
FOKFX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FOKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FOKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMDEX vs. FOKFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Praxis Growth Index Fund (MMDEX) and Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio (FOKFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MMDEXFOKFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.39

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.48

3.75

-2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.11

14.72

-9.61

MMDEX vs. FOKFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMDEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the FOKFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMDEX and FOKFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MMDEX vs. FOKFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMDEX drawdown since its inception was -49.99%, which is greater than FOKFX's maximum drawdown of -37.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMDEX and FOKFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MMDEXFOKFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.99%

-37.26%

-12.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.73%

-12.53%

-3.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.16%

-24.81%

+1.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.36%

-37.26%

+3.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.05%

-5.48%

-0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.94%

-9.15%

+1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.54%

3.18%

+1.36%

Volatility

MMDEX vs. FOKFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Praxis Growth Index Fund (MMDEX) is 6.86%, while Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio (FOKFX) has a volatility of 9.55%. This indicates that MMDEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FOKFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MMDEXFOKFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.86%

9.55%

-2.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.33%

16.75%

-3.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.88%

20.39%

-3.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.04%

23.33%

-2.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.63%

24.76%

-4.13%

MMDEX vs. FOKFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMDEX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than FOKFX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

MMDEX vs. FOKFX - Dividend Comparison

MMDEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, more than FOKFX's 3.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FOKFX
Fidelity OTC K6 Portfolio
3.47%4.20%4.58%0.24%0.08%3.81%0.39%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MMDEX
Praxis Growth Index Fund
4.45%4.69%1.65%2.02%5.77%1.42%6.66%12.23%5.03%3.42%1.08%1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, MMDEX and FOKFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FOKFX has higher volatility (9.55%) compared to MMDEX (6.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMDEX dropped -49.99% vs FOKFX's -37.26%.

FOKFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MMDEX and FOKFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer