MLPX vs. SIL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MLPX (Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF) and SIL (Global X Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MLPX is a MLPs fund tracking the Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index, while SIL is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MLPX returned 12.41%/yr vs 10.69%/yr for SIL. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MLPX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SIL.

Performance

MLPX vs. SIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPX achieves a 23.59% return, which is significantly higher than SIL's 4.75% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPX has outperformed SIL with an annualized return of 12.41%, while SIL has yielded a comparatively lower 10.69% annualized return.

MLPX

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: -2.15%
• YTD: 23.59%
• 6M: 23.51%
• 1Y: 22.94%
• 3Y*: 28.13%
• 5Y*: 20.92%
• 10Y*: 12.41%

SIL

• 1D: -4.96%
• 1M: 0.68%
• YTD: 4.75%
• 6M: 15.66%
• 1Y: 91.23%
• 3Y*: 49.15%
• 5Y*: 13.96%
• 10Y*: 10.69%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPX vs. SIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF	23.59%	4.96%	42.90%	15.77%	21.54%	39.63%	-20.32%	19.04%	-15.64%	-4.53%
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF	4.75%	166.16%	14.62%	1.31%	-22.83%	-18.35%	40.30%	34.78%	-22.42%	1.67%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPX and SIL is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2013	0.26

The correlation between MLPX and SIL shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MLPX vs. SIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MLPX	SIL
Energy	99.5%	-
Utilities	0.3%	-
Basic Materials	-	99.8%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	0.2%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

MLPX vs. SIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPX

MLPX Risk / Return Rank: 44
MLPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
MLPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
MLPX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
MLPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
MLPX Martin Ratio Rank: 44

SIL

SIL Risk / Return Rank: 48
SIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
SIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
SIL Omega Ratio Rank: 46
SIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
SIL Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPX vs. SIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MLPX	SIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	1.83	-0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.09	2.17	-0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.30	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.82	2.79	+0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.27	7.14	+0.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MLPX vs. SIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the SIL Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPX and SIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MLPX	SIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.50	1.83	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.05	0.36	+0.69
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	0.27	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	0.14	+0.22

Drawdowns

MLPX vs. SIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPX drawdown since its inception was -70.67%, smaller than the maximum SIL drawdown of -82.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPX and SIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLPX	SIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.67%	-82.99%	+12.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.18%	-32.91%	+24.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.77%	-32.91%	+16.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.72%	-55.08%	+35.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.70%	-63.04%	-1.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.68%	-25.87%	+20.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.63%	-51.45%	+34.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.17%	12.82%	-9.65%

Volatility

MLPX vs. SIL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) is 6.41%, while Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) has a volatility of 17.66%. This indicates that MLPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MLPX	SIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.41%	17.66%	-11.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.84%	41.57%	-29.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.38%	50.01%	-34.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.08%	39.21%	-19.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.50%	39.60%	-13.10%

MLPX vs. SIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than SIL's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

MLPX vs. SIL - Dividend Comparison

MLPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, more than SIL's 1.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF	4.15%	4.88%	4.30%	5.22%	5.23%	5.98%	8.32%	5.78%	5.77%	4.36%	5.50%	4.81%
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF	1.13%	1.18%	2.40%	0.59%	0.48%	1.59%	1.92%	1.53%	1.21%	0.02%	3.34%	0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MLPX and SIL in my portfolio?

MLPX and SIL have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MLPX or SIL?

SIL has higher volatility (17.66%) compared to MLPX (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPX dropped -70.67% vs SIL's -82.99%.

Which ETF is better, MLPX or SIL?

On 10-year performance, MLPX leads with 12.41% vs 10.69% for SIL. On fees, MLPX is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, MLPX has been the lower-risk option at 6.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MLPX or SIL?

Over the 10-year period, MLPX has performed better with a 12.41% return vs 10.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MLPX or SIL?

MLPX is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SIL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MLPX or SIL?

MLPX has the higher dividend yield at 4.15%, compared with 1.13% for SIL.

What is the main difference between MLPX and SIL?

MLPX is categorized as MLPs, while SIL is Silver. MLPX tracks Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index, while SIL tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for MLPX and 0.65% for SIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.