PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPX vs. ITA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPX vs. ITA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) and iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPX achieves a 25.23% return, which is significantly higher than ITA's 8.97% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPX has underperformed ITA with an annualized return of 12.72%, while ITA has yielded a comparatively higher 15.34% annualized return.


MLPX

1D
0.30%
1M
-1.75%
YTD
25.23%
6M
25.77%
1Y
24.35%
3Y*
28.72%
5Y*
20.50%
10Y*
12.72%

ITA

1D
-0.95%
1M
4.16%
YTD
8.97%
6M
11.71%
1Y
30.42%
3Y*
27.30%
5Y*
16.86%
10Y*
15.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPX vs. ITA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLPX
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
25.23%4.96%42.90%15.77%21.54%39.63%-20.32%19.04%-15.64%-4.53%
ITA
iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF
8.97%48.64%15.81%14.33%9.96%9.39%-13.57%30.51%-7.22%35.24%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPX and ITA is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2013

0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between MLPX and ITA has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

MLPX vs. ITA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MLPX
ITA

Energy

99.6%

-

Utilities

0.3%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

99.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

0.1%

Energy

MLPX
99.6%
ITA

-

Utilities

MLPX
0.3%
ITA

-

Basic Materials

MLPX

-

ITA

-

Communication Services

MLPX

-

ITA

-

Consumer Cyclical

MLPX

-

ITA

-

Consumer Defensive

MLPX

-

ITA

-

Financial Services

MLPX

-

ITA

-

Healthcare

MLPX

-

ITA

-

Industrials

MLPX

-

ITA
99.8%

Real Estate

MLPX

-

ITA

-

Technology

MLPX

-

ITA
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPX vs. ITA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPX
MLPX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
MLPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

ITA
ITA Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
ITA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITA Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
ITA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITA Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPX vs. ITA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) and iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MLPXITADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.25

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

1.97

+1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.67

5.20

+2.47

MLPX vs. ITA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the ITA Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPX and ITA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MLPX vs. ITA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPX drawdown since its inception was -70.67%, which is greater than ITA's maximum drawdown of -59.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPX and ITA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPXITADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.67%

-59.72%

-10.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.18%

-15.82%

+7.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.77%

-15.82%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.72%

-18.72%

-1.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.70%

-51.00%

-13.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.43%

-6.64%

+2.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.60%

-9.45%

-7.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

5.97%

-2.71%

Volatility

MLPX vs. ITA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) is 5.77%, while iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA) has a volatility of 9.07%. This indicates that MLPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPXITADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.77%

9.07%

-3.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.69%

18.47%

-6.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.23%

21.74%

-6.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.08%

20.21%

-0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.48%

23.22%

+3.26%

MLPX vs. ITA - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ITA's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLPX vs. ITA - Dividend Comparison

MLPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, more than ITA's 0.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITA
iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.46%0.55%0.85%0.93%0.95%0.82%1.07%1.54%1.13%0.91%1.07%1.04%
MLPX
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
4.10%4.88%4.30%5.22%5.23%5.98%8.32%5.78%5.77%4.36%5.50%4.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLPX and ITA have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ITA has higher volatility (9.07%) compared to MLPX (5.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPX dropped -70.67% vs ITA's -59.72%.

On 10-year performance, ITA leads with 15.34% vs 12.72% for MLPX. On fees, ITA is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, MLPX has been the lower-risk option at 5.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ITA has performed better with a 15.34% return vs 12.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITA is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for MLPX.

MLPX has the higher dividend yield at 4.10%, compared with 0.46% for ITA.

MLPX is categorized as MLPs, while ITA is Aerospace & Defense. MLPX tracks Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index, while ITA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Aerospace & Defense Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for MLPX and 0.38% for ITA.

MLPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPX and ITA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer