MLPX vs. FMUB

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

MLPX (Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF) and FMUB (Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MLPX is a MLPs fund tracking the Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index, while FMUB is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Fidelity. MLPX is passively managed, while FMUB is actively managed. Over the past year, MLPX returned 23.19% vs 7.03% for FMUB. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. MLPX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for FMUB.

Performance

MLPX vs. FMUB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) and Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF (FMUB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPX achieves a 23.27% return, which is significantly higher than FMUB's 2.07% return.

MLPX

• 1D: 1.07%
• 1M: -5.57%
• YTD: 23.27%
• 6M: 24.71%
• 1Y: 23.19%
• 3Y*: 28.84%
• 5Y*: 20.93%
• 10Y*: 12.27%

FMUB

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 1.40%
• YTD: 2.07%
• 6M: 2.12%
• 1Y: 7.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPX vs. FMUB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF	23.27%	10.62%
FMUB Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF	2.07%	4.69%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPX and FMUB is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025	-0.10

Return for Risk

MLPX vs. FMUB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPX

MLPX Risk / Return Rank: 46
MLPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
MLPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
MLPX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
MLPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
MLPX Martin Ratio Rank: 44

FMUB

FMUB Risk / Return Rank: 77
FMUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
FMUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
FMUB Omega Ratio Rank: 91
FMUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
FMUB Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPX vs. FMUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) and Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF (FMUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MLPX	FMUB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	2.66	-1.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.13	3.88	-1.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.56	-0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.85	2.83	+0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.87	11.26	-4.40

MLPX vs. FMUB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is lower than the FMUB Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPX and FMUB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MLPX vs. FMUB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPX drawdown since its inception was -70.67%, which is greater than FMUB's maximum drawdown of -2.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPX and FMUB.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLPX	FMUB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.67%	-2.74%	-67.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.18%	-2.49%	-5.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.77%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.72%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.93%	-0.13%	-5.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.59%	-0.47%	-16.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.39%	0.63%	+2.76%

Volatility

MLPX vs. FMUB - Volatility Comparison

Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) has a higher volatility of 5.48% compared to Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF (FMUB) at 0.75%. This indicates that MLPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMUB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MLPX	FMUB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.48%	0.75%	+4.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.71%	2.05%	+9.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.38%	2.66%	+12.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.98%	3.64%	+16.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.49%	3.64%	+22.85%

MLPX vs. FMUB - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FMUB's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

MLPX vs. FMUB - Dividend Comparison

MLPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, more than FMUB's 3.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FMUB Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF	3.42%	2.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF	4.16%	4.88%	4.30%	5.22%	5.23%	5.98%	8.32%	5.78%	5.77%	4.36%	5.50%	4.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MLPX and FMUB in my portfolio?

MLPX and FMUB have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MLPX or FMUB?

MLPX has higher volatility (5.48%) compared to FMUB (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPX dropped -70.67% vs FMUB's -2.74%.

Which ETF is better, MLPX or FMUB?

On 1-year performance, MLPX leads with 23.19% vs 7.03% for FMUB. On fees, FMUB is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, FMUB has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MLPX or FMUB?

Over the 1-year period, MLPX has performed better with a 23.19% return vs 7.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MLPX or FMUB?

FMUB is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for MLPX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MLPX or FMUB?

MLPX has the higher dividend yield at 4.16%, compared with 3.42% for FMUB.

What is the main difference between MLPX and FMUB?

MLPX is categorized as MLPs, while FMUB is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for MLPX and 0.30% for FMUB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FMUB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.