PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMUB vs. VTEB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMUB vs. VTEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF (FMUB) and Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMUB achieves a 0.94% return, which is significantly higher than VTEB's 0.31% return.


FMUB

1D
-0.13%
1M
-1.59%
6M
0.32%
YTD
0.94%
1Y
4.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.29%

VTEB

1D
-0.10%
1M
-1.84%
6M
-0.23%
YTD
0.31%
1Y
4.77%
3Y*
2.92%
5Y*
0.53%
10Y*
1.88%
ALL TIME*
2.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.86M$2.43M$1.70M
$377.87M$352.76M$360.69M

FMUB vs. VTEB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FMUB and VTEB is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025

0.80

The correlation between FMUB and VTEB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMUB vs. VTEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FMUB
FMUB Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FMUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMUB Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FMUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMUB Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

VTEB
VTEB Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VTEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTEB Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
VTEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTEB Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FMUB vs. VTEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF (FMUB) and Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMUBVTEBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.41

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

2.00

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.91

6.62

+1.29

FMUB vs. VTEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMUB Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the VTEB Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMUB and VTEB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMUB vs. VTEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMUB drawdown since its inception was -2.74%, smaller than the maximum VTEB drawdown of -17.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMUB and VTEB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMUBVTEBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.74%

-17.00%

+14.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.49%

-2.71%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.62%

-1.86%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.48%

-2.30%

+1.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.67%

0.82%

-0.15%

Volatility

FMUB vs. VTEB - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF (FMUB) and Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEB) have volatilities of 0.86% and 0.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMUBVTEBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.86%

0.88%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.19%

2.22%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75%

2.79%

-0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.59%

3.92%

-0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.59%

5.25%

-1.66%

FMUB vs. VTEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMUB has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VTEB's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMUB vs. VTEB - Dividend Comparison

FMUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than VTEB's 3.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMUB
Fidelity Municipal Bond Opportunities ETF
3.55%2.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTEB
Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF
3.14%3.29%3.14%2.79%2.09%1.64%1.99%2.30%2.25%1.96%1.66%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMUB and VTEB have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTEB has higher volatility (0.88%) compared to FMUB (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMUB dropped -2.74% vs VTEB's -17.00%.

On 1-year performance, FMUB leads with 4.81% vs 4.77% for VTEB. On fees, VTEB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FMUB has performed better with a 4.81% return vs 4.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTEB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for FMUB.

FMUB has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 3.14% for VTEB.

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FMUB and 0.03% for VTEB.

FMUB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMUB and VTEB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer