PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPX vs. DXJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPX vs. DXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPX achieves a 25.23% return, which is significantly higher than DXJ's 18.74% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPX has underperformed DXJ with an annualized return of 12.72%, while DXJ has yielded a comparatively higher 18.72% annualized return.


MLPX

1D
0.30%
1M
-1.75%
YTD
25.23%
6M
25.77%
1Y
24.35%
3Y*
28.72%
5Y*
20.50%
10Y*
12.72%

DXJ

1D
0.74%
1M
-0.37%
YTD
18.74%
6M
19.84%
1Y
54.41%
3Y*
30.91%
5Y*
26.01%
10Y*
18.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPX vs. DXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLPX
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
25.23%4.96%42.90%15.77%21.54%39.63%-20.32%19.04%-15.64%-4.53%
DXJ
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund
18.74%32.78%29.83%42.04%5.96%17.99%3.94%18.94%-19.78%22.81%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPX and DXJ is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2013

0.41

Over the past year, the correlation between MLPX and DXJ has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

MLPX vs. DXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MLPX
DXJ

Energy

99.6%
1.7%

Utilities

0.3%
0.1%

Basic Materials

-

8.5%

Communication Services

-

2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

15.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.7%

Financial Services

-

18.3%

Healthcare

-

6.8%

Industrials

-

27.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

12.9%

Energy

MLPX
99.6%
DXJ
1.7%

Utilities

MLPX
0.3%
DXJ
0.1%

Basic Materials

MLPX

-

DXJ
8.5%

Communication Services

MLPX

-

DXJ
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

MLPX

-

DXJ
15.6%

Consumer Defensive

MLPX

-

DXJ
4.7%

Financial Services

MLPX

-

DXJ
18.3%

Healthcare

MLPX

-

DXJ
6.8%

Industrials

MLPX

-

DXJ
27.4%

Real Estate

MLPX

-

DXJ

-

Technology

MLPX

-

DXJ
12.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPX vs. DXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPX
MLPX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
MLPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

DXJ
DXJ Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
DXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPX vs. DXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) and WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MLPXDXJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.54

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

4.88

-1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.67

18.93

-11.26

MLPX vs. DXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the DXJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPX and DXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MLPX vs. DXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPX drawdown since its inception was -70.67%, which is greater than DXJ's maximum drawdown of -49.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPX and DXJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPXDXJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.67%

-49.63%

-21.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.18%

-10.98%

+2.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.77%

-22.19%

+5.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.72%

-22.19%

+2.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.70%

-39.14%

-25.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.43%

-1.34%

-3.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.60%

-14.32%

-2.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

2.83%

+0.43%

Volatility

MLPX vs. DXJ - Volatility Comparison

Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) has a higher volatility of 5.77% compared to WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund (DXJ) at 4.64%. This indicates that MLPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPXDXJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.77%

4.64%

+1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.69%

13.56%

-1.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.23%

17.73%

-2.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.08%

19.02%

+1.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.48%

20.17%

+6.31%

MLPX vs. DXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than DXJ's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLPX vs. DXJ - Dividend Comparison

MLPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, more than DXJ's 1.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DXJ
WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Fund
1.09%1.29%3.48%3.44%3.02%2.64%2.53%2.47%2.92%2.30%1.98%5.95%
MLPX
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF
4.10%4.88%4.30%5.22%5.23%5.98%8.32%5.78%5.77%4.36%5.50%4.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLPX and DXJ have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MLPX has higher volatility (5.77%) compared to DXJ (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPX dropped -70.67% vs DXJ's -49.63%.

On 10-year performance, DXJ leads with 18.72% vs 12.72% for MLPX. On fees, MLPX is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, DXJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DXJ has performed better with a 18.72% return vs 12.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MLPX is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for DXJ.

MLPX has the higher dividend yield at 4.10%, compared with 1.09% for DXJ.

MLPX is categorized as MLPs, while DXJ is Japan Equities. MLPX tracks Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index, while DXJ tracks WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for MLPX and 0.48% for DXJ.

DXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPX and DXJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer