MLPX vs. AMLP
MLPX (Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF) and AMLP (Alerian MLP ETF) are both MLPs funds - MLPX tracks the Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index while AMLP tracks the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MLPX returned 12.41%/yr vs 6.76%/yr for AMLP. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MLPX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for AMLP.
Performance
MLPX vs. AMLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLPX achieves a 23.59% return, which is significantly higher than AMLP's 16.31% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPX has outperformed AMLP with an annualized return of 12.41%, while AMLP has yielded a comparatively lower 6.76% annualized return.
MLPX
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- YTD
- 23.59%
- 6M
- 23.51%
- 1Y
- 22.94%
- 3Y*
- 28.13%
- 5Y*
- 20.92%
- 10Y*
- 12.41%
AMLP
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -0.57%
- YTD
- 16.31%
- 6M
- 14.89%
- 1Y
- 17.06%
- 3Y*
- 20.15%
- 5Y*
- 16.90%
- 10Y*
- 6.76%
MLPX vs. AMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 23.59% | 4.96% | 42.90% | 15.77% | 21.54% | 39.63% | -20.32% | 19.04% | -15.64% | -4.53% |
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 16.31% | 5.78% | 22.76% | 21.40% | 25.47% | 39.09% | -32.26% | 5.99% | -12.67% | -7.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPX and AMLP is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2013 | 0.88 |
The correlation between MLPX and AMLP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
MLPX vs. AMLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MLPX
AMLP
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Energy
MLPX
AMLP
Utilities
MLPX
AMLP
Basic Materials
MLPX
-
AMLP
-
Communication Services
MLPX
-
AMLP
-
Consumer Cyclical
MLPX
-
AMLP
-
Consumer Defensive
MLPX
-
AMLP
-
Financial Services
MLPX
-
AMLP
-
Healthcare
MLPX
-
AMLP
-
Industrials
MLPX
-
AMLP
-
Real Estate
MLPX
-
AMLP
-
Technology
MLPX
-
AMLP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLPX vs. AMLP — Risk / Return Rank
MLPX
AMLP
MLPX vs. AMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLPX | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.25 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | 1.92 | +0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.27 | 6.37 | +0.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLPX | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | 1.45 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.05 | 0.85 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.24 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.22 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
MLPX vs. AMLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPX drawdown since its inception was -70.67%, smaller than the maximum AMLP drawdown of -77.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPX and AMLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPX | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.67% | -77.19% | +6.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.18% | -8.94% | +0.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.77% | -14.27% | -2.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.72% | -20.92% | +1.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.70% | -72.62% | +7.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.68% | -4.10% | -1.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.63% | -17.40% | +0.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 2.68% | +0.49% |
Volatility
MLPX vs. AMLP - Volatility Comparison
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) has a higher volatility of 6.41% compared to Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) at 4.91%. This indicates that MLPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLPX | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.41% | 4.91% | +1.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.84% | 8.66% | +3.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.38% | 11.90% | +3.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.08% | 19.98% | +0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.50% | 27.68% | -1.18% |
MLPX vs. AMLP - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than AMLP's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
MLPX vs. AMLP - Dividend Comparison
MLPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, less than AMLP's 7.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 7.64% | 8.36% | 7.70% | 7.86% | 7.70% | 8.55% | 12.31% | 9.12% | 9.29% | 7.97% | 8.09% | 9.84% |
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.15% | 4.88% | 4.30% | 5.22% | 5.23% | 5.98% | 8.32% | 5.78% | 5.77% | 4.36% | 5.50% | 4.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MLPX and AMLP have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MLPX has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to AMLP (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPX dropped -70.67% vs AMLP's -77.19%.
On 10-year performance, MLPX leads with 12.41% vs 6.76% for AMLP. On fees, MLPX is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, AMLP has been the lower-risk option at 4.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MLPX has performed better with a 12.41% return vs 6.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MLPX is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for AMLP.
AMLP has the higher dividend yield at 7.64%, compared with 4.15% for MLPX.
MLPX tracks Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index, while AMLP tracks Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for MLPX and 0.90% for AMLP.
MLPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MLPX and AMLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer