MLPX vs. AMJB
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) and Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJB).
MLPX and AMJB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MLPX is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Aug 7, 2013. AMJB is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the Alerian MLP Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2024. Both MLPX and AMJB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
MLPX vs. AMJB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MLPX vs. AMJB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 23.52% | 4.96% | 41.06% |
AMJB Alerian MLP Index ETN | 17.28% | 7.91% | 17.90% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLPX achieves a 23.52% return, which is significantly higher than AMJB's 17.28% return.
MLPX
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 3.80%
- YTD
- 23.52%
- 6M
- 20.89%
- 1Y
- 21.69%
- 3Y*
- 29.25%
- 5Y*
- 24.62%
- 10Y*
- 14.53%
AMJB
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 17.28%
- 6M
- 20.78%
- 1Y
- 13.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MLPX vs. AMJB - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than AMJB's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MLPX vs. AMJB — Risk / Return Rank
MLPX
AMJB
MLPX vs. AMJB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) and Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLPX | AMJB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | 0.67 | +0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.51 | 0.99 | +0.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.14 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | 0.76 | +0.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.48 | 2.01 | +2.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLPX | AMJB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 0.67 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 1.15 | -0.79 |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPX and AMJB is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MLPX vs. AMJB - Dividend Comparison
MLPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%, less than AMJB's 5.71% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.06% | 4.88% | 4.30% | 5.22% | 5.23% | 5.98% | 8.32% | 5.78% | 5.77% | 4.36% | 5.50% | 4.81% |
AMJB Alerian MLP Index ETN | 5.71% | 6.52% | 5.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MLPX vs. AMJB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPX drawdown since its inception was -70.67%, which is greater than AMJB's maximum drawdown of -16.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPX and AMJB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPX | AMJB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.67% | -16.98% | -53.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.92% | -16.98% | +2.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.01% | -3.00% | +0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.81% | -3.71% | -13.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.81% | 6.38% | -1.57% |
Volatility
MLPX vs. AMJB - Volatility Comparison
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) and Alerian MLP Index ETN (AMJB) have volatilities of 3.63% and 3.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MLPX | AMJB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | 3.70% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.35% | 10.23% | +0.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.88% | 20.11% | -1.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.00% | 17.74% | +2.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.59% | 17.74% | +8.85% |