PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPR vs. MLPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPR vs. MLPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) and Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPR achieves a 29.81% return, which is significantly higher than MLPI's 17.58% return.


MLPR

1D
-0.37%
1M
-1.12%
YTD
29.81%
6M
26.95%
1Y
32.42%
3Y*
32.14%
5Y*
26.89%
10Y*

MLPI

1D
0.04%
1M
-3.13%
YTD
17.58%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPR vs. MLPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MLPR and MLPI is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2025

0.73

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPR vs. MLPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPR
MLPR Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
MLPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPR Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPR Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

MLPI
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPR vs. MLPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) and Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLPRMLPIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.53

MLPR vs. MLPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLPRMLPIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

3.49

-2.55

Drawdowns

MLPR vs. MLPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPR drawdown since its inception was -48.98%, which is greater than MLPI's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPR and MLPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPRMLPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.98%

-5.38%

-43.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.07%

-3.84%

-3.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.94%

-1.27%

-7.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.32%

Volatility

MLPR vs. MLPI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPRMLPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.64%

13.05%

+7.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.52%

13.05%

+16.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.75%

13.05%

+20.70%

MLPR vs. MLPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than MLPI's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLPR vs. MLPI - Dividend Comparison

MLPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.00%, more than MLPI's 6.04% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
MLPI
Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF
6.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MLPR
ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN
9.00%10.85%9.57%10.08%7.49%10.69%4.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLPR and MLPI have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MLPI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MLPI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MLPR.

MLPR has the higher dividend yield at 9.00%, compared with 6.04% for MLPI.

MLPR is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while MLPI is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MLPR and 0.68% for MLPI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPR and MLPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer