MLPR vs. IWDL
MLPR (ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN) and IWDL (ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds from UBS - MLPR tracks the Alerian MLP Index (150%) while IWDL tracks the Russell 1000 Value (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MLPR returned 31.23%/yr vs 15.88%/yr for IWDL. Their 0.53 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
MLPR vs. IWDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MLPR having a 39.50% return and IWDL slightly lower at 39.21%.
MLPR
- 1D
- 1.62%
- 1M
- 11.14%
- 6M
- 25.11%
- YTD
- 39.50%
- 1Y
- 39.67%
- 3Y*
- 31.28%
- 5Y*
- 31.23%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 32.46%
IWDL
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 4.16%
- 6M
- 28.37%
- YTD
- 39.21%
- 1Y
- 64.77%
- 3Y*
- 28.65%
- 5Y*
- 15.88%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 19.33%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $52.17K | $113.62K | $51.97K | |
| $34.92K | $44.03K | $37.73K |
MLPR vs. IWDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPR ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN | 39.50% | 9.83% | 31.57% | 35.87% | 41.04% | 39.69% |
IWDL ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN | 39.21% | 25.02% | 20.68% | 13.50% | -21.27% | 40.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPR and IWDL is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2021 | 0.53 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MLPR and IWDL has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLPR vs. IWDL — Risk / Return Rank
MLPR
IWDL
MLPR vs. IWDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) and ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN (IWDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MLPR | IWDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.44 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | 4.51 | -1.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.25 | 19.08 | -11.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MLPR vs. IWDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPR drawdown since its inception was -48.98%, which is greater than IWDL's maximum drawdown of -37.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPR and IWDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPR | IWDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.98% | -37.95% | -11.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.31% | -13.53% | -0.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.45% | -31.78% | +7.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.66% | -37.95% | +9.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -0.09% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.89% | -10.31% | +1.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.35% | 3.20% | +2.15% |
Volatility
MLPR vs. IWDL - Volatility Comparison
ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) has a higher volatility of 8.44% compared to ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN (IWDL) at 5.45%. This indicates that MLPR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLPR | IWDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.44% | 5.45% | +2.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.18% | 16.84% | +0.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.38% | 23.44% | -1.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.11% | 30.22% | -1.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.66% | 29.82% | +3.84% |
MLPR vs. IWDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MLPR and IWDL have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
MLPR vs. IWDL - Dividend Comparison
MLPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.83%, while IWDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWDL ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MLPR ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN | 8.83% | 10.85% | 9.57% | 10.08% | 7.49% | 10.69% | 4.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MLPR and IWDL have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MLPR has higher volatility (8.44%) compared to IWDL (5.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPR dropped -48.98% vs IWDL's -37.95%.
On 5-year performance, MLPR leads with 31.23% vs 15.88% for IWDL. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, IWDL has been the lower-risk option at 5.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MLPR has performed better with a 31.23% return vs 15.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MLPR and IWDL have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
MLPR has the higher dividend yield at 8.83%, compared with 0.00% for IWDL.
MLPR tracks Alerian MLP Index (150%), while IWDL tracks Russell 1000 Value (200%).
IWDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MLPR and IWDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer