MLPR vs. AMNA
Compare and contrast key facts about ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA).
MLPR and AMNA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MLPR is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Alerian MLP Index (150%). It was launched on Jun 2, 2020. AMNA is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. It was launched on Jun 19, 2020. Both MLPR and AMNA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MLPR or AMNA.
Key characteristics
| MLPR | AMNA | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 19.29% | 12.42% |
| 1Y Return | 48.38% | 25.15% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 32.11% | 15.42% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.92 | 1.95 |
| Daily Std Dev | 19.13% | 13.19% |
| Max Drawdown | -48.98% | -18.83% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.66% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPR and AMNA is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
MLPR vs. AMNA - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, MLPR achieves a 19.29% return, which is significantly higher than AMNA's 12.42% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MLPR vs. AMNA - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AMNA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MLPR vs. AMNA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MLPR vs. AMNA - Dividend Comparison
MLPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.38%, more than AMNA's 5.28% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPR ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN | 9.38% | 10.08% | 10.07% | 10.69% | 4.21% |
AMNA ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN | 5.28% | 5.61% | 5.48% | 5.84% | 2.12% |
Drawdowns
MLPR vs. AMNA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPR drawdown since its inception was -48.98%, which is greater than AMNA's maximum drawdown of -18.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPR and AMNA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MLPR vs. AMNA - Volatility Comparison
ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) has a higher volatility of 6.53% compared to ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA) at 3.71%. This indicates that MLPR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.