MLPR vs. AMNA
Compare and contrast key facts about ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA).
MLPR and AMNA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MLPR is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Alerian MLP Index (150%). It was launched on Jun 2, 2020. AMNA is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. It was launched on Jun 19, 2020. Both MLPR and AMNA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MLPR or AMNA.
Correlation
The correlation between MLPR and AMNA is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
MLPR vs. AMNA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
Returns By Period
MLPR
2.71%
-14.77%
11.60%
15.70%
N/A
N/A
AMNA
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MLPR vs. AMNA - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AMNA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MLPR vs. AMNA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
MLPR
AMNA
MLPR vs. AMNA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MLPR vs. AMNA - Dividend Comparison
MLPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.59%, while AMNA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPR ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN | 10.59% | 9.57% | 10.08% | 10.07% | 10.69% | 4.21% |
AMNA ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN | 2.19% | 4.32% | 5.61% | 5.48% | 5.84% | 2.13% |
Drawdowns
MLPR vs. AMNA - Drawdown Comparison
Volatility
MLPR vs. AMNA - Volatility Comparison
ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) has a higher volatility of 20.86% compared to ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA) at 0.00%. This indicates that MLPR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.