PortfoliosLab logo
MLPR vs. AMNA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MLPR and AMNA is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

MLPR vs. AMNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


MLPR

YTD

8.10%

1M

4.27%

6M

6.37%

1Y

17.30%

3Y*

29.02%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

AMNA

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MLPR vs. AMNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AMNA's 0.75% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MLPR vs. AMNA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MLPR is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MLPR is 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MLPR is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MLPR is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MLPR is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MLPR is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

AMNA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AMNA is 9898
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AMNA is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AMNA is 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AMNA is 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AMNA is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AMNA is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MLPR vs. AMNA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

MLPR vs. AMNA - Dividend Comparison

MLPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.07%, while AMNA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020
MLPR
ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN
10.07%9.57%10.08%10.07%10.69%4.21%
AMNA
ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN
2.19%4.32%5.61%5.48%5.84%2.13%

Drawdowns

MLPR vs. AMNA - Drawdown Comparison


Loading data...

Volatility

MLPR vs. AMNA - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...