MLPR vs. AMTR
MLPR (ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN) and AMTR (ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - MLPR is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Alerian MLP Index (150%), while AMTR is a MLPs fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MLPR charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AMTR.
Performance
MLPR vs. AMTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MLPR
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -1.12%
- YTD
- 29.81%
- 6M
- 26.95%
- 1Y
- 32.42%
- 3Y*
- 32.14%
- 5Y*
- 26.89%
- 10Y*
- —
AMTR
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MLPR vs. AMTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPR ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN | 29.81% | 9.83% | 31.57% | 35.87% | 41.04% | 57.33% | 32.32% |
AMTR ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 44.68% | 12.75% | 20.41% | 36.99% | 15.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPR and AMTR is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2020 | 0.77 |
The correlation between MLPR and AMTR shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (3 years) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLPR vs. AMTR — Risk / Return Rank
MLPR
AMTR
MLPR vs. AMTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN (AMTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLPR | AMTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.53 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLPR | AMTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | — | — |
Drawdowns
MLPR vs. AMTR - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPR | AMTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.07% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.94% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.32% | — | — |
Volatility
MLPR vs. AMTR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLPR | AMTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.12% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.85% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.64% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.52% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.75% | — | — |
MLPR vs. AMTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AMTR's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MLPR vs. AMTR - Dividend Comparison
MLPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.00%, while AMTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMTR ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MLPR ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN | 9.00% | 10.85% | 9.57% | 10.08% | 7.49% | 10.69% | 4.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MLPR and AMTR have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMTR is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMTR is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for MLPR.
MLPR has the higher dividend yield at 9.00%, compared with 0.00% for AMTR.
MLPR is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while AMTR is MLPs. MLPR tracks Alerian MLP Index (150%), while AMTR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MLPR and 0.75% for AMTR.
Find the right allocation for MLPR and AMTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer