MLPR vs. AMLP
Compare and contrast key facts about ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP).
MLPR and AMLP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MLPR is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Alerian MLP Index (150%). It was launched on Jun 2, 2020. AMLP is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Aug 23, 2010. Both MLPR and AMLP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
MLPR vs. AMLP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MLPR vs. AMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPR ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN | 24.29% | 9.83% | 31.57% | 35.87% | 41.04% | 57.33% | -9.51% |
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 14.20% | 5.78% | 22.76% | 21.40% | 25.47% | 39.09% | -3.66% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLPR achieves a 24.29% return, which is significantly higher than AMLP's 14.20% return.
MLPR
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- YTD
- 24.29%
- 6M
- 30.59%
- 1Y
- 15.78%
- 3Y*
- 32.28%
- 5Y*
- 32.14%
- 10Y*
- —
AMLP
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- 1.15%
- YTD
- 14.20%
- 6M
- 16.89%
- 1Y
- 9.93%
- 3Y*
- 20.27%
- 5Y*
- 20.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MLPR vs. AMLP - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AMLP's 0.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MLPR vs. AMLP — Risk / Return Rank
MLPR
AMLP
MLPR vs. AMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLPR | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.57 | 0.62 | -0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.86 | 0.89 | -0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.13 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.62 | 0.68 | -0.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.44 | 1.72 | -0.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLPR | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 | 0.62 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.09 | 1.02 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 0.22 | +0.71 |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPR and AMLP is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MLPR vs. AMLP - Dividend Comparison
MLPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.14%, more than AMLP's 7.54% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPR ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN | 9.14% | 10.85% | 9.57% | 10.08% | 7.49% | 10.69% | 4.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 7.54% | 8.36% | 7.70% | 7.86% | 7.70% | 8.55% | 12.31% | 9.12% | 9.29% | 7.97% | 8.09% | 9.84% |
Drawdowns
MLPR vs. AMLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPR drawdown since its inception was -48.98%, smaller than the maximum AMLP drawdown of -77.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPR and AMLP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPR | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.98% | -77.19% | +28.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.45% | -14.27% | -10.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.66% | -20.92% | -7.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -72.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.17% | -2.17% | -2.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.09% | -17.57% | +8.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.53% | 5.60% | +4.93% |
Volatility
MLPR vs. AMLP - Volatility Comparison
ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) has a higher volatility of 4.93% compared to Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) at 2.92%. This indicates that MLPR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MLPR | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | 2.92% | +2.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.06% | 7.86% | +6.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.04% | 16.08% | +11.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.60% | 20.18% | +9.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.01% | 27.84% | +6.17% |