PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPQ.L vs. SXLE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPQ.L vs. SXLE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (MLPQ.L) and State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MLPQ.L is traded in GBp, while SXLE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SXLE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPQ.L achieves a 18.94% return, which is significantly lower than SXLE.L's 31.04% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPQ.L has underperformed SXLE.L with an annualized return of 7.75%, while SXLE.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.40% annualized return.


MLPQ.L

1D
-0.55%
1M
0.83%
YTD
18.94%
6M
13.87%
1Y
16.79%
3Y*
15.76%
5Y*
18.54%
10Y*
7.75%

SXLE.L

1D
-0.28%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
31.04%
6M
28.53%
1Y
47.78%
3Y*
14.31%
5Y*
21.51%
10Y*
10.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPQ.L vs. SXLE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLPQ.L
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF
18.94%-4.55%24.63%12.94%47.46%38.65%-33.55%3.85%-9.99%-16.88%
SXLE.L
State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF
31.04%1.92%5.56%-4.41%82.11%52.20%-33.89%5.04%-13.28%-9.73%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPQ.L and SXLE.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2015

0.71

The correlation between MLPQ.L and SXLE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

MLPQ.L vs. SXLE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MLPQ.L
SXLE.L

Energy

96.7%
100.0%

Utilities

3.2%

-

Industrials

0.2%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Energy

MLPQ.L
96.7%
SXLE.L
100.0%

Utilities

MLPQ.L
3.2%
SXLE.L

-

Industrials

MLPQ.L
0.2%
SXLE.L

-

Basic Materials

MLPQ.L

-

SXLE.L

-

Communication Services

MLPQ.L

-

SXLE.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

MLPQ.L

-

SXLE.L

-

Consumer Defensive

MLPQ.L

-

SXLE.L

-

Financial Services

MLPQ.L

-

SXLE.L

-

Healthcare

MLPQ.L

-

SXLE.L

-

Real Estate

MLPQ.L

-

SXLE.L

-

Technology

MLPQ.L

-

SXLE.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPQ.L vs. SXLE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPQ.L
MLPQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
MLPQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

SXLE.L
SXLE.L Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SXLE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXLE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXLE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SXLE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXLE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPQ.L vs. SXLE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (MLPQ.L) and State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLPQ.LSXLE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.35

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

2.86

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.31

8.85

-4.54

MLPQ.L vs. SXLE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the SXLE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPQ.L and SXLE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLPQ.LSXLE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

2.06

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

0.81

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.37

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.40

-0.21

Drawdowns

MLPQ.L vs. SXLE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPQ.L drawdown since its inception was -75.62%, which is greater than SXLE.L's maximum drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPQ.L and SXLE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPQ.LSXLE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.62%

-62.09%

-13.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.07%

-16.65%

+7.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.04%

-23.84%

+4.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.04%

-23.84%

+4.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.07%

-62.09%

-11.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.53%

-9.06%

+5.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.03%

-15.52%

-4.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.89%

5.38%

-1.49%

Volatility

MLPQ.L vs. SXLE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (MLPQ.L) is 6.19%, while State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L) has a volatility of 8.66%. This indicates that MLPQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SXLE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPQ.LSXLE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.19%

8.66%

-2.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.70%

19.47%

-6.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.11%

23.18%

-7.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.75%

26.52%

-6.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.79%

28.35%

-0.56%

MLPQ.L vs. SXLE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPQ.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SXLE.L's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLPQ.L vs. SXLE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MLPQ.L nor SXLE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MLPQ.L and SXLE.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SXLE.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SXLE.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MLPQ.L.

MLPQ.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while SXLE.L tracks S&P Energy Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MLPQ.L and 0.15% for SXLE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPQ.L and SXLE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer