MLPQ.L vs. SXLE.L
MLPQ.L (Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF) and SXLE.L (State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - MLPQ.L tracks the MSCI World/Energy NR USD while SXLE.L tracks the S&P Energy Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MLPQ.L returned 7.75%/yr vs 10.40%/yr for SXLE.L. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MLPQ.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SXLE.L.
Performance
MLPQ.L vs. SXLE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MLPQ.L is traded in GBp, while SXLE.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SXLE.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLPQ.L achieves a 18.94% return, which is significantly lower than SXLE.L's 31.04% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPQ.L has underperformed SXLE.L with an annualized return of 7.75%, while SXLE.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.40% annualized return.
MLPQ.L
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- YTD
- 18.94%
- 6M
- 13.87%
- 1Y
- 16.79%
- 3Y*
- 15.76%
- 5Y*
- 18.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.75%
SXLE.L
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 31.04%
- 6M
- 28.53%
- 1Y
- 47.78%
- 3Y*
- 14.31%
- 5Y*
- 21.51%
- 10Y*
- 10.40%
MLPQ.L vs. SXLE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPQ.L Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF | 18.94% | -4.55% | 24.63% | 12.94% | 47.46% | 38.65% | -33.55% | 3.85% | -9.99% | -16.88% |
SXLE.L State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF | 31.04% | 1.92% | 5.56% | -4.41% | 82.11% | 52.20% | -33.89% | 5.04% | -13.28% | -9.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPQ.L and SXLE.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2015 | 0.71 |
The correlation between MLPQ.L and SXLE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
MLPQ.L vs. SXLE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MLPQ.L
SXLE.L
Energy
Utilities
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Energy
MLPQ.L
SXLE.L
Utilities
MLPQ.L
SXLE.L
-
Industrials
MLPQ.L
SXLE.L
-
Basic Materials
MLPQ.L
-
SXLE.L
-
Communication Services
MLPQ.L
-
SXLE.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
MLPQ.L
-
SXLE.L
-
Consumer Defensive
MLPQ.L
-
SXLE.L
-
Financial Services
MLPQ.L
-
SXLE.L
-
Healthcare
MLPQ.L
-
SXLE.L
-
Real Estate
MLPQ.L
-
SXLE.L
-
Technology
MLPQ.L
-
SXLE.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLPQ.L vs. SXLE.L — Risk / Return Rank
MLPQ.L
SXLE.L
MLPQ.L vs. SXLE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (MLPQ.L) and State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLPQ.L | SXLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.35 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 2.86 | -1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.31 | 8.85 | -4.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLPQ.L | SXLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | 2.06 | -1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 0.81 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | 0.37 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.40 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
MLPQ.L vs. SXLE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPQ.L drawdown since its inception was -75.62%, which is greater than SXLE.L's maximum drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPQ.L and SXLE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPQ.L | SXLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.62% | -62.09% | -13.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.07% | -16.65% | +7.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.04% | -23.84% | +4.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.04% | -23.84% | +4.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.07% | -62.09% | -11.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.53% | -9.06% | +5.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.03% | -15.52% | -4.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.89% | 5.38% | -1.49% |
Volatility
MLPQ.L vs. SXLE.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (MLPQ.L) is 6.19%, while State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L) has a volatility of 8.66%. This indicates that MLPQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SXLE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLPQ.L | SXLE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.19% | 8.66% | -2.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.70% | 19.47% | -6.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.11% | 23.18% | -7.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.75% | 26.52% | -6.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.79% | 28.35% | -0.56% |
MLPQ.L vs. SXLE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPQ.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SXLE.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
MLPQ.L vs. SXLE.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither MLPQ.L nor SXLE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MLPQ.L and SXLE.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SXLE.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SXLE.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MLPQ.L.
MLPQ.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while SXLE.L tracks S&P Energy Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MLPQ.L and 0.15% for SXLE.L.
Find the right allocation for MLPQ.L and SXLE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer