PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPQ.L vs. MLPZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPQ.L vs. MLPZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (MLPQ.L) and Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund (MLPZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MLPQ.L is traded in GBp, while MLPZX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MLPZX values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MLPQ.L having a 20.29% return and MLPZX slightly higher at 20.57%. Over the past 10 years, MLPQ.L has underperformed MLPZX with an annualized return of 6.74%, while MLPZX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.55% annualized return.


MLPQ.L

1D
0.85%
1M
5.25%
6M
13.96%
YTD
20.29%
1Y
18.65%
3Y*
16.90%
5Y*
19.30%
10Y*
6.74%

MLPZX

1D
-2.00%
1M
2.73%
6M
14.80%
YTD
20.57%
1Y
24.23%
3Y*
20.37%
5Y*
21.05%
10Y*
9.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPQ.L vs. MLPZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLPQ.L
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF
20.29%-4.55%24.63%12.94%47.46%38.65%-33.55%3.85%-10.58%-16.33%
MLPZX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund
20.57%0.19%26.71%14.67%39.98%46.36%-27.68%10.15%-7.76%-16.34%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPQ.L and MLPZX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2013

0.61

The correlation between MLPQ.L and MLPZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPQ.L vs. MLPZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPQ.L
MLPQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MLPQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

MLPZX
MLPZX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
MLPZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPZX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPQ.L vs. MLPZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (MLPQ.L) and Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund (MLPZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MLPQ.LMLPZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.29

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

3.40

-1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.43

7.63

-3.20

MLPQ.L vs. MLPZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the MLPZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPQ.L and MLPZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MLPQ.L vs. MLPZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPQ.L drawdown since its inception was -81.18%, which is greater than MLPZX's maximum drawdown of -71.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPQ.L and MLPZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPQ.LMLPZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.18%

-71.45%

-9.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.07%

-6.92%

-2.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.78%

-16.38%

-5.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.78%

-16.38%

-5.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.07%

-71.45%

-2.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.44%

-4.38%

+1.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.85%

-10.63%

-24.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.20%

3.08%

+1.12%

Volatility

MLPQ.L vs. MLPZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (MLPQ.L) is 3.96%, while Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund (MLPZX) has a volatility of 5.91%. This indicates that MLPQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLPZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPQ.LMLPZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.96%

5.91%

-1.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.92%

11.12%

+1.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.45%

14.04%

+2.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.47%

17.15%

+6.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.98%

25.72%

+3.26%

MLPQ.L vs. MLPZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPQ.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPZX's 1.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLPQ.L vs. MLPZX - Dividend Comparison

MLPQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MLPZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.08%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLPQ.L
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MLPZX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund
6.08%6.87%5.92%7.19%7.98%9.19%16.57%13.12%13.27%10.70%9.79%10.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLPQ.L and MLPZX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPQ.L and MLPZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer