PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPQ.L vs. FSENX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MLPQ.L vs. FSENX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (MLPQ.L) and Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MLPQ.L vs. FSENX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLPQ.L
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF
20.41%-4.55%24.63%12.94%47.46%38.65%-33.55%3.85%-9.99%-16.88%
FSENX
Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio
43.62%2.68%6.08%-4.10%82.36%56.78%-34.50%5.72%-20.49%-11.07%
Different Trading Currencies

MLPQ.L is traded in GBp, while FSENX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FSENX values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPQ.L achieves a 20.41% return, which is significantly lower than FSENX's 43.62% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPQ.L has underperformed FSENX with an annualized return of 10.68%, while FSENX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.27% annualized return.


MLPQ.L

1D
-0.53%
1M
5.51%
YTD
20.41%
6M
20.87%
1Y
7.01%
3Y*
17.06%
5Y*
22.41%
10Y*
10.68%

FSENX

1D
-0.64%
1M
12.96%
YTD
43.62%
6M
45.29%
1Y
44.31%
3Y*
16.76%
5Y*
27.72%
10Y*
12.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MLPQ.L vs. FSENX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPQ.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FSENX's 0.77% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MLPQ.L vs. FSENX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPQ.L
MLPQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
MLPQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

FSENX
FSENX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FSENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSENX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FSENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSENX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPQ.L vs. FSENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (MLPQ.L) and Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLPQ.LFSENXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.37

1.81

-1.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.59

2.29

-1.70

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.34

-0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

2.39

-1.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.72

6.27

-5.55

MLPQ.L vs. FSENX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the FSENX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPQ.L and FSENX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLPQ.LFSENXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

1.81

-1.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.14

1.04

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.40

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.24

-0.05

Correlation

The correlation between MLPQ.L and FSENX is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

MLPQ.L vs. FSENX - Dividend Comparison

MLPQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSENX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLPQ.L
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FSENX
Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio
1.38%1.95%1.95%1.98%2.50%2.25%3.43%1.84%1.48%1.74%0.62%1.29%

Drawdowns

MLPQ.L vs. FSENX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPQ.L drawdown since its inception was -75.62%, which is greater than FSENX's maximum drawdown of -68.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPQ.L and FSENX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPQ.LFSENXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.62%

-76.24%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.22%

-19.96%

+3.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.04%

-28.02%

+8.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.07%

-72.11%

-1.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

-1.22%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.25%

-17.06%

-3.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.44%

5.69%

+3.75%

Volatility

MLPQ.L vs. FSENX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (MLPQ.L) is 4.30%, while Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX) has a volatility of 5.13%. This indicates that MLPQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSENX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MLPQ.LFSENXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.30%

5.13%

-0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.82%

13.79%

-3.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.88%

25.39%

-6.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.71%

26.77%

-7.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.90%

30.50%

-2.60%