PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPQ.L vs. AMLP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MLPQ.L vs. AMLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (MLPQ.L) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MLPQ.L vs. AMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLPQ.L
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF
20.41%-4.55%24.63%12.94%47.46%38.65%-33.55%3.85%-9.99%-16.88%
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
16.37%-1.76%24.91%15.33%40.39%40.40%-34.25%1.96%-7.50%-15.86%
Different Trading Currencies

MLPQ.L is traded in GBp, while AMLP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AMLP values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPQ.L achieves a 20.41% return, which is significantly higher than AMLP's 16.37% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPQ.L has outperformed AMLP with an annualized return of 10.68%, while AMLP has yielded a comparatively lower 9.43% annualized return.


MLPQ.L

1D
-0.53%
1M
5.51%
YTD
20.41%
6M
20.87%
1Y
7.01%
3Y*
17.06%
5Y*
22.41%
10Y*
10.68%

AMLP

1D
-1.45%
1M
3.14%
YTD
16.37%
6M
18.89%
1Y
7.40%
3Y*
17.52%
5Y*
21.47%
10Y*
9.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MLPQ.L vs. AMLP - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPQ.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than AMLP's 0.90% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MLPQ.L vs. AMLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPQ.L
MLPQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
MLPQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

AMLP
AMLP Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
AMLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMLP Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
AMLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMLP Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPQ.L vs. AMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (MLPQ.L) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLPQ.LAMLPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.37

0.44

-0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.59

0.69

-0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.10

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

0.52

-0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.72

0.91

-0.19

MLPQ.L vs. AMLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is comparable to the AMLP Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPQ.L and AMLP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLPQ.LAMLPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

0.44

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.14

1.10

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.34

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.26

-0.07

Correlation

The correlation between MLPQ.L and AMLP is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

MLPQ.L vs. AMLP - Dividend Comparison

MLPQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.54%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLPQ.L
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
7.54%8.36%7.70%7.86%7.70%8.55%12.31%9.12%9.29%7.97%8.09%9.84%

Drawdowns

MLPQ.L vs. AMLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPQ.L drawdown since its inception was -75.62%, which is greater than AMLP's maximum drawdown of -70.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPQ.L and AMLP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPQ.LAMLPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.62%

-77.19%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.22%

-14.27%

-1.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.04%

-20.92%

+1.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.07%

-72.62%

-1.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

-2.17%

+1.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.25%

-17.57%

-2.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.44%

5.60%

+3.84%

Volatility

MLPQ.L vs. AMLP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (MLPQ.L) has a higher volatility of 4.30% compared to Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) at 3.17%. This indicates that MLPQ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MLPQ.LAMLPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.30%

3.17%

+1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.82%

8.68%

+1.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.88%

16.77%

+2.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.71%

19.61%

+0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.90%

27.67%

+0.23%