MLPQ.L vs. ^SIXU
MLPQ.L (Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while ^SIXU (Utilities Select Sector Index) is an index.
Performance
MLPQ.L vs. ^SIXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MLPQ.L is traded in GBp, while ^SIXU is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^SIXU values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
MLPQ.L
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- 5.25%
- 6M
- 13.96%
- YTD
- 20.29%
- 1Y
- 18.65%
- 3Y*
- 16.90%
- 5Y*
- 19.30%
- 10Y*
- 6.74%
^SIXU
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MLPQ.L vs. ^SIXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MLPQ.L Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF | 0.85% |
^SIXU Utilities Select Sector Index | 0.56% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLPQ.L vs. ^SIXU — Risk / Return Rank
MLPQ.L
^SIXU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MLPQ.L vs. ^SIXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (MLPQ.L) and Utilities Select Sector Index (^SIXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MLPQ.L | ^SIXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.43 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MLPQ.L vs. ^SIXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPQ.L drawdown since its inception was -81.18%, which is greater than ^SIXU's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPQ.L and ^SIXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPQ.L | ^SIXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.18% | 0.00% | -81.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.44% | 0.00% | -2.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.85% | 0.00% | -34.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.20% | — | — |
Volatility
MLPQ.L vs. ^SIXU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLPQ.L | ^SIXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.96% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.92% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.45% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.47% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.98% | — | — |
Find the right allocation for MLPQ.L and ^SIXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer