MLPQ.L vs. PMLP.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MLPQ.L (Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF) and PMLP.L (HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF) are both Energy Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD, from Invesco and HANetf respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MLPQ.L returned 18.67%/yr vs 19.66%/yr for PMLP.L. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MLPQ.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for PMLP.L.

Performance

MLPQ.L vs. PMLP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (MLPQ.L) and HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (PMLP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPQ.L achieves a 19.60% return, which is significantly lower than PMLP.L's 25.60% return.

MLPQ.L

• 1D: 1.38%
• 1M: 2.14%
• YTD: 19.60%
• 6M: 15.65%
• 1Y: 17.12%
• 3Y*: 16.27%
• 5Y*: 18.67%
• 10Y*: 8.16%

PMLP.L

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: 25.60%
• 6M: 23.75%
• 1Y: 28.09%
• 3Y*: 21.97%
• 5Y*: 19.66%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPQ.L vs. PMLP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MLPQ.L Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF	19.60%	-4.55%	24.63%	12.94%	47.46%	38.65%	8.93%
PMLP.L HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF	25.60%	-1.40%	35.81%	7.61%	35.33%	34.88%	8.45%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPQ.L and PMLP.L is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2020	0.79

The correlation between MLPQ.L and PMLP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

MLPQ.L vs. PMLP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MLPQ.L	PMLP.L
Energy	96.7%	100.0%
Utilities	3.2%	-
Industrials	0.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

MLPQ.L vs. PMLP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPQ.L

MLPQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 30
MLPQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
MLPQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
MLPQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 28
MLPQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
MLPQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 30

PMLP.L

PMLP.L Risk / Return Rank: 44
PMLP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
PMLP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
PMLP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 40
PMLP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
PMLP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPQ.L vs. PMLP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (MLPQ.L) and HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (PMLP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MLPQ.L	PMLP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	1.48	-0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.47	2.01	-0.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.25	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.88	2.58	-0.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.40	7.47	-3.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MLPQ.L vs. PMLP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is comparable to the PMLP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPQ.L and PMLP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MLPQ.L	PMLP.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.06	1.48	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95	1.01	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	1.27	-1.08

Drawdowns

MLPQ.L vs. PMLP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPQ.L drawdown since its inception was -75.62%, which is greater than PMLP.L's maximum drawdown of -20.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPQ.L and PMLP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLPQ.L	PMLP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.62%	-20.50%	-55.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.07%	-10.82%	+1.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.04%	-20.50%	+1.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.04%	-20.50%	+1.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-74.07%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.00%	-5.14%	+2.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.04%	-5.88%	-14.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.88%	3.75%	+0.13%

Volatility

MLPQ.L vs. PMLP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (MLPQ.L) is 6.19%, while HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (PMLP.L) has a volatility of 7.43%. This indicates that MLPQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PMLP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MLPQ.L	PMLP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.19%	7.43%	-1.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.68%	15.51%	-2.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.13%	18.86%	-2.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.75%	19.86%	-0.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.80%	21.34%	+6.46%

MLPQ.L vs. PMLP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPQ.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PMLP.L's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

MLPQ.L vs. PMLP.L - Dividend Comparison

MLPQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PMLP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MLPQ.L Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PMLP.L HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF	2.77%	3.31%	3.37%	6.48%	6.12%	6.57%	4.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MLPQ.L and PMLP.L in my portfolio?

MLPQ.L and PMLP.L have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MLPQ.L or PMLP.L?

On fees, PMLP.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MLPQ.L or PMLP.L?

PMLP.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MLPQ.L.

What is the main difference between MLPQ.L and PMLP.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MLPQ.L and 0.40% for PMLP.L.