PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPZX vs. AMLP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPZX vs. AMLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund (MLPZX) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPZX achieves a 19.85% return, which is significantly higher than AMLP's 18.74% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPZX has outperformed AMLP with an annualized return of 9.65%, while AMLP has yielded a comparatively lower 6.74% annualized return.


MLPZX

1D
-0.66%
1M
0.27%
6M
16.81%
YTD
19.85%
1Y
23.42%
3Y*
21.37%
5Y*
18.92%
10Y*
9.65%

AMLP

1D
1.88%
1M
2.99%
6M
15.34%
YTD
18.74%
1Y
19.21%
3Y*
19.54%
5Y*
18.25%
10Y*
6.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPZX vs. AMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLPZX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund
19.85%7.88%24.54%20.71%25.10%44.98%-25.49%14.50%-12.92%-8.42%
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
18.74%5.78%22.76%21.40%25.47%39.09%-32.26%5.99%-12.67%-7.89%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPZX and AMLP is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2010

0.93

The correlation between MLPZX and AMLP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPZX vs. AMLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPZX
MLPZX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
MLPZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPZX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

AMLP
AMLP Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
AMLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMLP Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
AMLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMLP Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPZX vs. AMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund (MLPZX) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MLPZXAMLPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.27

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

2.16

+1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.35

6.04

+3.31

MLPZX vs. AMLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the AMLP Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPZX and AMLP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MLPZX vs. AMLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPZX drawdown since its inception was -77.56%, roughly equal to the maximum AMLP drawdown of -77.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPZX and AMLP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPZXAMLPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.56%

-77.19%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.48%

-8.94%

+1.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.46%

-14.27%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.90%

-20.92%

+3.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.62%

-72.62%

-1.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.43%

-2.10%

-2.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.47%

-17.32%

+3.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

3.19%

-0.65%

Volatility

MLPZX vs. AMLP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund (MLPZX) is 4.94%, while Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) has a volatility of 5.24%. This indicates that MLPZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPZXAMLPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.94%

5.24%

-0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.58%

9.62%

-0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.19%

12.50%

-0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.20%

19.69%

-2.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.81%

27.65%

-1.84%

MLPZX vs. AMLP - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPZX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than AMLP's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLPZX vs. AMLP - Dividend Comparison

MLPZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.15%, less than AMLP's 7.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
7.49%8.36%7.70%7.86%7.70%8.55%12.31%9.12%9.29%7.97%8.09%9.84%
MLPZX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund
6.15%6.87%5.92%7.19%7.98%9.19%16.57%13.12%13.27%10.70%9.79%10.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, MLPZX and AMLP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AMLP has higher volatility (5.24%) compared to MLPZX (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPZX dropped -77.56% vs AMLP's -77.19%.

MLPZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPZX and AMLP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer