PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPZX vs. AMLP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPZX vs. AMLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund (MLPZX) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPZX achieves a 16.50% return, which is significantly higher than AMLP's 12.04% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPZX has outperformed AMLP with an annualized return of 9.59%, while AMLP has yielded a comparatively lower 6.33% annualized return.


MLPZX

1D
0.14%
1M
-6.51%
YTD
16.50%
6M
16.68%
1Y
19.56%
3Y*
20.73%
5Y*
18.79%
10Y*
9.59%

AMLP

1D
-0.02%
1M
-7.08%
YTD
12.04%
6M
12.19%
1Y
12.67%
3Y*
19.33%
5Y*
15.63%
10Y*
6.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPZX vs. AMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLPZX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund
16.50%7.88%24.54%20.71%25.10%44.98%-25.49%14.50%-12.92%-8.42%
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
12.04%5.78%22.76%21.40%25.47%39.09%-32.26%5.99%-12.67%-7.89%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPZX and AMLP is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2010

0.93

The correlation between MLPZX and AMLP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPZX vs. AMLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPZX
MLPZX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
MLPZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPZX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPZX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

AMLP
AMLP Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
AMLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMLP Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
AMLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMLP Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPZX vs. AMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund (MLPZX) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MLPZXAMLPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.19

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

1.42

+1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.08

4.32

+4.76

MLPZX vs. AMLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the AMLP Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPZX and AMLP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MLPZX vs. AMLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPZX drawdown since its inception was -77.56%, roughly equal to the maximum AMLP drawdown of -77.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPZX and AMLP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPZXAMLPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.56%

-77.19%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.23%

-8.94%

+1.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.46%

-14.27%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.90%

-20.92%

+3.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.62%

-72.62%

-1.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.10%

-7.62%

+0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.50%

-17.36%

+3.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

2.94%

-0.73%

Volatility

MLPZX vs. AMLP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund (MLPZX) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) have volatilities of 4.26% and 4.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPZXAMLPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.26%

4.48%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.98%

8.85%

+0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.69%

11.98%

-0.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.25%

19.75%

-2.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.84%

27.68%

-1.84%

MLPZX vs. AMLP - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPZX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than AMLP's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLPZX vs. AMLP - Dividend Comparison

MLPZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.27%, less than AMLP's 7.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
7.94%8.36%7.70%7.86%7.70%8.55%12.31%9.12%9.29%7.97%8.09%9.84%
MLPZX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Income Fund
6.27%6.87%5.92%7.19%7.98%9.19%16.57%13.12%13.27%10.70%9.79%10.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, MLPZX and AMLP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AMLP has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to MLPZX (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPZX dropped -77.56% vs AMLP's -77.19%.

MLPZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPZX and AMLP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer