^SIXU vs. LNT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

^SIXU (Utilities Select Sector Index) is an index, while LNT (Alliant Energy Corporation) is a stock.

Performance

^SIXU vs. LNT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Utilities Select Sector Index (^SIXU) and Alliant Energy Corporation (LNT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

^SIXU

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LNT

• 1D: 1.86%
• 1M: 0.84%
• YTD: 16.50%
• 6M: 16.06%
• 1Y: 25.38%
• 3Y*: 16.78%
• 5Y*: 9.22%
• 10Y*: 10.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

^SIXU vs. LNT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
^SIXU Utilities Select Sector Index	0.87%
LNT Alliant Energy Corporation	1.86%

Return for Risk

^SIXU vs. LNT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^SIXU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LNT

LNT Risk / Return Rank: 83
LNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
LNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
LNT Omega Ratio Rank: 79
LNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
LNT Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^SIXU vs. LNT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Utilities Select Sector Index (^SIXU) and Alliant Energy Corporation (LNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	^SIXU	LNT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.63	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.25	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.28	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.64	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	8.67	—

Drawdowns

^SIXU vs. LNT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^SIXU drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum LNT drawdown of -51.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^SIXU and LNT.

Drawdown Indicators

	^SIXU	LNT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-51.66%	+51.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.01%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.35%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.60%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-8.74%	+8.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.94%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	^SIXU	LNT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.00%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.02%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	15.69%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	19.69%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	21.20%	—