^SIXU vs. LNT
^SIXU (Utilities Select Sector Index) is an index, while LNT (Alliant Energy Corporation) is a stock.
Performance
^SIXU vs. LNT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
^SIXU
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
LNT
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -8.60%
- 6M
- 9.02%
- YTD
- 11.42%
- 1Y
- 11.47%
- 3Y*
- 13.67%
- 5Y*
- 7.32%
- 10Y*
- 9.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.15%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $187.65M | $180.29M | $185.93M |
^SIXU vs. LNT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
^SIXU Utilities Select Sector Index | -0.80% |
LNT Alliant Energy Corporation | 0.60% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
^SIXU vs. LNT — Risk / Return Rank
^SIXU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LNT
^SIXU vs. LNT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Utilities Select Sector Index (^SIXU) and Alliant Energy Corporation (LNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ^SIXU | LNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.14 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.35 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.81 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
^SIXU vs. LNT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ^SIXU drawdown since its inception was -0.80%, smaller than the maximum LNT drawdown of -51.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^SIXU and LNT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ^SIXU | LNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.80% | -51.66% | +50.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -8.60% | +7.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.80% | -8.73% | +7.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.23% | — |
Volatility
^SIXU vs. LNT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ^SIXU | LNT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.64% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.36% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 16.28% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 19.81% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 21.24% | — |
Find the right allocation for ^SIXU and LNT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer