PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPOX vs. OPGSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPOX vs. OPGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund (MLPOX) and Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund (OPGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPOX achieves a 17.97% return, which is significantly higher than OPGSX's 3.54% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPOX has underperformed OPGSX with an annualized return of 8.95%, while OPGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.19% annualized return.


MLPOX

1D
1.16%
1M
-0.90%
YTD
17.97%
6M
17.71%
1Y
19.41%
3Y*
25.96%
5Y*
21.73%
10Y*
8.95%

OPGSX

1D
1.33%
1M
1.97%
YTD
3.54%
6M
10.42%
1Y
57.81%
3Y*
38.46%
5Y*
16.13%
10Y*
15.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPOX vs. OPGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLPOX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund
17.97%4.47%40.63%20.44%29.45%39.81%-30.40%6.71%-14.77%-6.96%
OPGSX
Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund
3.54%131.03%13.05%6.35%-16.86%-2.75%36.15%46.37%-13.15%17.17%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPOX and OPGSX is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2010

0.24

The correlation between MLPOX and OPGSX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPOX vs. OPGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPOX
MLPOX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
MLPOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPOX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPOX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

OPGSX
OPGSX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
OPGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OPGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
OPGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
OPGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
OPGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPOX vs. OPGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund (MLPOX) and Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund (OPGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLPOXOPGSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.27

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

2.28

+1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.50

5.89

+3.61

MLPOX vs. OPGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the OPGSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPOX and OPGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLPOXOPGSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

1.54

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.12

0.49

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.47

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.26

+0.06

Drawdowns

MLPOX vs. OPGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPOX drawdown since its inception was -76.99%, roughly equal to the maximum OPGSX drawdown of -80.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPOX and OPGSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPOXOPGSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.99%

-80.04%

+3.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.07%

-29.01%

+22.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.18%

-29.01%

+13.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.17%

-47.09%

+25.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.41%

-47.09%

-25.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.04%

-22.32%

+18.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.42%

-29.29%

+12.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

10.74%

-8.58%

Volatility

MLPOX vs. OPGSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund (MLPOX) is 4.96%, while Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund (OPGSX) has a volatility of 13.17%. This indicates that MLPOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OPGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPOXOPGSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.96%

13.17%

-8.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.70%

35.90%

-27.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.47%

43.24%

-31.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.49%

33.57%

-14.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.97%

32.88%

-6.91%

MLPOX vs. OPGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPOX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than OPGSX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLPOX vs. OPGSX - Dividend Comparison

MLPOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, more than OPGSX's 0.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLPOX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund
4.79%5.31%4.26%5.55%6.19%7.52%13.39%10.42%10.08%8.00%7.18%7.85%
OPGSX
Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund
0.41%0.43%0.86%0.81%0.45%3.56%1.55%0.29%0.00%2.78%7.21%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLPOX and OPGSX have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OPGSX has higher volatility (13.17%) compared to MLPOX (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPOX dropped -76.99% vs OPGSX's -80.04%.

MLPOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPOX and OPGSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer