PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPOX vs. ACSTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPOX vs. ACSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund (MLPOX) and Invesco Comstock Fund (ACSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPOX achieves a 17.97% return, which is significantly higher than ACSTX's 9.14% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPOX has underperformed ACSTX with an annualized return of 8.95%, while ACSTX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.56% annualized return.


MLPOX

1D
1.16%
1M
-0.90%
YTD
17.97%
6M
17.71%
1Y
19.41%
3Y*
25.96%
5Y*
21.73%
10Y*
8.95%

ACSTX

1D
0.45%
1M
3.08%
YTD
9.14%
6M
10.66%
1Y
23.62%
3Y*
18.06%
5Y*
11.69%
10Y*
12.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPOX vs. ACSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLPOX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund
17.97%4.47%40.63%20.44%29.45%39.81%-30.40%6.71%-14.77%-6.96%
ACSTX
Invesco Comstock Fund
9.14%17.22%15.00%12.37%0.74%33.33%-0.78%24.35%-12.34%17.75%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPOX and ACSTX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2010

0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between MLPOX and ACSTX has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPOX vs. ACSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPOX
MLPOX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
MLPOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPOX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPOX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

ACSTX
ACSTX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
ACSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ACSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPOX vs. ACSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund (MLPOX) and Invesco Comstock Fund (ACSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLPOXACSTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.80

2.27

-0.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.48

3.27

-0.79

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.41

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

3.06

+0.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.50

11.64

-2.14

MLPOX vs. ACSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the ACSTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPOX and ACSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLPOXACSTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

2.27

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.12

0.76

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.65

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.51

-0.19

Drawdowns

MLPOX vs. ACSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPOX drawdown since its inception was -76.99%, which is greater than ACSTX's maximum drawdown of -58.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPOX and ACSTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPOXACSTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.99%

-58.61%

-18.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.07%

-8.02%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.18%

-15.61%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.17%

-17.25%

-3.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.41%

-44.80%

-27.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.04%

-0.24%

-3.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.42%

-9.35%

-7.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

2.10%

+0.06%

Volatility

MLPOX vs. ACSTX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund (MLPOX) has a higher volatility of 4.96% compared to Invesco Comstock Fund (ACSTX) at 2.48%. This indicates that MLPOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPOXACSTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.96%

2.48%

+2.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.70%

8.01%

+0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.47%

10.84%

+0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.49%

15.41%

+4.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.97%

19.46%

+6.51%

MLPOX vs. ACSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPOX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than ACSTX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLPOX vs. ACSTX - Dividend Comparison

MLPOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, less than ACSTX's 8.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACSTX
Invesco Comstock Fund
8.10%8.79%10.17%8.44%13.00%8.66%2.05%6.66%10.03%3.60%6.98%1.10%
MLPOX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund
4.79%5.31%4.26%5.55%6.19%7.52%13.39%10.42%10.08%8.00%7.18%7.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLPOX and ACSTX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MLPOX has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to ACSTX (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPOX dropped -76.99% vs ACSTX's -58.61%.

ACSTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPOX and ACSTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer