MLPOX vs. DHIVX
MLPOX (Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund) and DHIVX (Centre Global Infrastructure Fund) are both mutual funds - MLPOX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Invesco, while DHIVX is a Infrastructure Equities fund managed by Centre Funds. Over the past 5 years, MLPOX returned 23.74%/yr vs 9.08%/yr for DHIVX. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MLPOX charges 1.29%/yr vs 1.57%/yr for DHIVX.
Performance
MLPOX vs. DHIVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLPOX achieves a 21.85% return, which is significantly higher than DHIVX's 9.29% return.
MLPOX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 3.43%
- 6M
- 14.95%
- YTD
- 21.85%
- 1Y
- 23.45%
- 3Y*
- 23.81%
- 5Y*
- 23.74%
- 10Y*
- 9.35%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.62%
DHIVX
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- 6M
- 4.08%
- YTD
- 9.29%
- 1Y
- 12.16%
- 3Y*
- 16.41%
- 5Y*
- 9.08%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.78%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
MLPOX vs. DHIVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPOX Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund | 21.85% | 4.47% | 40.63% | 20.44% | 29.45% | 39.81% | -30.40% | 6.71% | -2.07% |
DHIVX Centre Global Infrastructure Fund | 9.29% | 16.30% | 20.25% | 5.34% | -3.28% | 7.51% | -7.17% | 25.27% | -4.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPOX and DHIVX is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2018 | 0.63 |
The correlation between MLPOX and DHIVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLPOX vs. DHIVX — Risk / Return Rank
MLPOX
DHIVX
MLPOX vs. DHIVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund (MLPOX) and Centre Global Infrastructure Fund (DHIVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MLPOX | DHIVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.23 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.90 | 1.89 | +2.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.38 | 4.85 | +4.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MLPOX vs. DHIVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLPOX drawdown since its inception was -76.99%, which is greater than DHIVX's maximum drawdown of -36.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPOX and DHIVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPOX | DHIVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.99% | -36.18% | -40.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.93% | -6.93% | +1.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.18% | -8.08% | -7.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.17% | -20.41% | -0.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.47% | -5.06% | +3.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.29% | -5.57% | -10.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.46% | 2.69% | -0.23% |
Volatility
MLPOX vs. DHIVX - Volatility Comparison
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund (MLPOX) has a higher volatility of 3.90% compared to Centre Global Infrastructure Fund (DHIVX) at 3.10%. This indicates that MLPOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DHIVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLPOX | DHIVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.90% | 3.10% | +0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.22% | 8.32% | +0.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.73% | 10.11% | +1.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.05% | 12.38% | +6.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.96% | 14.62% | +11.34% |
MLPOX vs. DHIVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPOX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is lower than DHIVX's 1.57% expense ratio.
Dividends
MLPOX vs. DHIVX - Dividend Comparison
MLPOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.75%, more than DHIVX's 3.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHIVX Centre Global Infrastructure Fund | 3.21% | 3.66% | 2.54% | 1.60% | 1.85% | 1.70% | 2.43% | 2.31% | 2.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MLPOX Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund | 4.75% | 5.31% | 4.26% | 5.55% | 6.19% | 7.52% | 13.39% | 10.42% | 10.08% | 8.00% | 7.18% | 7.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MLPOX and DHIVX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MLPOX has higher volatility (3.90%) compared to DHIVX (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPOX dropped -76.99% vs DHIVX's -36.18%.
MLPOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MLPOX and DHIVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer