MLPOX vs. ACEIX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

MLPOX (Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund) and ACEIX (Invesco Equity and Income Fund) are both mutual funds - MLPOX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Invesco, while ACEIX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Invesco. Over the past 10 years, MLPOX returned 9.40%/yr vs 8.92%/yr for ACEIX. Their 0.55 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MLPOX charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for ACEIX.

Performance

MLPOX vs. ACEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund (MLPOX) and Invesco Equity and Income Fund (ACEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPOX achieves a 22.76% return, which is significantly higher than ACEIX's 7.85% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPOX has outperformed ACEIX with an annualized return of 9.40%, while ACEIX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.92% annualized return.

MLPOX

• 1D: 0.75%
• 1M: 4.21%
• 6M: 16.78%
• YTD: 22.76%
• 1Y: 24.37%
• 3Y*: 24.31%
• 5Y*: 23.92%
• 10Y*: 9.40%
• ALL TIME*: 7.67%

ACEIX

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: 0.86%
• 6M: 4.80%
• YTD: 7.85%
• 1Y: 15.80%
• 3Y*: 12.24%
• 5Y*: 7.56%
• 10Y*: 8.92%
• ALL TIME*: 8.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ACEIX Invesco Equity and Income Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
MLPOX Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

MLPOX vs. ACEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MLPOX Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund	22.76%	4.47%	40.63%	20.44%	29.45%	39.81%	-30.40%	6.71%	-14.77%	-6.96%
ACEIX Invesco Equity and Income Fund	7.85%	12.85%	11.77%	10.08%	-7.75%	18.02%	9.96%	19.17%	-9.74%	10.86%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPOX and ACEIX is 0.16, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.16
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.41
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.55
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2010	0.55

Over the past year, the correlation between MLPOX and ACEIX has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

MLPOX vs. ACEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MLPOX

MLPOX Risk / Return Rank: 80
MLPOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
MLPOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
MLPOX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
MLPOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
MLPOX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

ACEIX

ACEIX Risk / Return Rank: 76
ACEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
ACEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
ACEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
ACEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
ACEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MLPOX vs. ACEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund (MLPOX) and Invesco Equity and Income Fund (ACEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MLPOX	ACEIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.99	1.79	+0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.75	2.54	+0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.32	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.94	2.70	+1.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.74	11.20	-1.46

MLPOX vs. ACEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the ACEIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPOX and ACEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MLPOX vs. ACEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPOX drawdown since its inception was -76.99%, which is greater than ACEIX's maximum drawdown of -40.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPOX and ACEIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLPOX	ACEIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.99%	-40.08%	-36.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.93%	-5.50%	-0.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.18%	-12.40%	-2.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.17%	-16.73%	-4.44%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-72.41%	-30.80%	-41.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.74%	0.00%	-0.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.29%	-4.59%	-11.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.46%	1.33%	+1.13%

Volatility

MLPOX vs. ACEIX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund (MLPOX) has a higher volatility of 3.82% compared to Invesco Equity and Income Fund (ACEIX) at 2.28%. This indicates that MLPOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MLPOX	ACEIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.82%	2.28%	+1.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.22%	6.28%	+2.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.74%	8.34%	+3.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.05%	11.06%	+7.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.95%	12.76%	+13.19%

MLPOX vs. ACEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPOX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than ACEIX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

MLPOX vs. ACEIX - Dividend Comparison

MLPOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, less than ACEIX's 6.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACEIX Invesco Equity and Income Fund	6.43%	6.87%	8.28%	6.91%	6.65%	13.74%	2.94%	5.53%	8.91%	6.73%	3.94%	5.17%
MLPOX Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund	4.72%	5.31%	4.26%	5.55%	6.19%	7.52%	13.39%	10.42%	10.08%	8.00%	7.18%	7.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MLPOX and ACEIX in my portfolio?

MLPOX and ACEIX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MLPOX or ACEIX?

MLPOX has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to ACEIX (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPOX dropped -76.99% vs ACEIX's -40.08%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MLPOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.