PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPLX vs. MLPAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPLX vs. MLPAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund Class A (MLPLX) and Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A (MLPAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPLX achieves a 25.29% return, which is significantly higher than MLPAX's 17.69% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MLPLX having a 8.82% annualized return and MLPAX not far behind at 8.64%.


MLPLX

1D
1.54%
1M
-1.46%
YTD
25.29%
6M
24.87%
1Y
27.55%
3Y*
31.45%
5Y*
26.85%
10Y*
8.82%

MLPAX

1D
1.05%
1M
-0.97%
YTD
17.69%
6M
17.41%
1Y
19.10%
3Y*
25.81%
5Y*
21.52%
10Y*
8.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPLX vs. MLPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLPLX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund Class A
25.29%4.36%47.10%25.02%38.31%55.18%-46.03%8.79%-21.09%-11.18%
MLPAX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A
17.69%4.31%40.77%20.43%29.07%39.45%-30.58%5.60%-15.05%-7.22%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPLX and MLPAX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012

0.99

The correlation between MLPLX and MLPAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPLX vs. MLPAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPLX
MLPLX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
MLPLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPLX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPLX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

MLPAX
MLPAX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
MLPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPLX vs. MLPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund Class A (MLPLX) and Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A (MLPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLPLXMLPAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.30

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

3.28

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.47

9.15

+0.33

MLPLX vs. MLPAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the MLPAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPLX and MLPAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLPLXMLPAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

1.78

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.07

1.11

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.33

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.30

-0.12

Drawdowns

MLPLX vs. MLPAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPLX drawdown since its inception was -88.76%, which is greater than MLPAX's maximum drawdown of -77.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPLX and MLPAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPLXMLPAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.76%

-77.51%

-11.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.86%

-6.17%

-2.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.55%

-15.29%

-4.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.21%

-21.04%

-6.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.02%

-72.85%

-12.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.61%

-4.07%

-1.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.99%

-17.05%

-11.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

2.20%

+0.90%

Volatility

MLPLX vs. MLPAX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund Class A (MLPLX) has a higher volatility of 6.78% compared to Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A (MLPAX) at 4.84%. This indicates that MLPLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLPAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPLXMLPAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.78%

4.84%

+1.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.24%

8.67%

+3.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.47%

11.44%

+5.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.24%

19.46%

+5.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.57%

25.98%

+9.59%

MLPLX vs. MLPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPLX has a 17.25% expense ratio, which is higher than MLPAX's 1.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLPLX vs. MLPAX - Dividend Comparison

MLPLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.90%, less than MLPAX's 5.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLPAX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Fund Class A
5.18%5.72%5.00%5.91%6.56%7.91%14.02%9.91%10.40%8.21%7.34%7.99%
MLPLX
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus Fund Class A
4.90%5.70%4.42%5.92%6.79%8.75%22.54%14.33%13.67%9.68%7.88%9.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, MLPLX and MLPAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MLPLX has higher volatility (6.78%) compared to MLPAX (4.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPLX dropped -88.76% vs MLPAX's -77.51%.

MLPLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPLX and MLPAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer