MLPI vs. PXJ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MLPI (Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF) and PXJ (Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. MLPI is actively managed, while PXJ is passively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MLPI charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for PXJ.

Performance

MLPI vs. PXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI) and Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPI achieves a 17.58% return, which is significantly lower than PXJ's 46.18% return.

MLPI

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -3.13%
• YTD: 17.58%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PXJ

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: -6.26%
• YTD: 46.18%
• 6M: 38.54%
• 1Y: 82.76%
• 3Y*: 24.79%
• 5Y*: 17.27%
• 10Y*: -0.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPI vs. PXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MLPI Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF	17.58%	0.56%
PXJ Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF	46.18%	1.81%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPI and PXJ is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2025	0.48

Return for Risk

MLPI vs. PXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PXJ

PXJ Risk / Return Rank: 89
PXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
PXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
PXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 80
PXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
PXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPI vs. PXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI) and Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MLPI	PXJ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.17	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.02	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.49	-0.05	+3.53

Drawdowns

MLPI vs. PXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPI drawdown since its inception was -5.38%, smaller than the maximum PXJ drawdown of -94.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPI and PXJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLPI	PXJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.38%	-94.82%	+89.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.10%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-40.03%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-40.03%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-87.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.84%	-66.60%	+62.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.27%	-55.67%	+54.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.46%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MLPI	PXJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.75%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	18.30%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.05%	26.41%	-13.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.05%	34.57%	-21.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.05%	39.47%	-26.42%

MLPI vs. PXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than PXJ's 0.63% expense ratio.

Dividends

MLPI vs. PXJ - Dividend Comparison

MLPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.04%, more than PXJ's 2.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MLPI Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF	6.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PXJ Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF	2.21%	2.91%	3.34%	1.99%	0.65%	2.40%	4.72%	1.87%	0.99%	2.75%	1.18%	2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MLPI and PXJ in my portfolio?

MLPI and PXJ have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MLPI or PXJ?

On fees, PXJ is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MLPI or PXJ?

PXJ is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for MLPI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MLPI or PXJ?

MLPI has the higher dividend yield at 6.04%, compared with 2.21% for PXJ.

What is the main difference between MLPI and PXJ?

They also come from different issuers: Neos and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for MLPI and 0.63% for PXJ.