MLPI vs. ENFR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MLPI (Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. MLPI is actively managed, while ENFR is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MLPI charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ENFR.

Performance

MLPI vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPI achieves a 17.58% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 24.60% return.

MLPI

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -3.13%
• YTD: 17.58%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ENFR

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: -1.01%
• YTD: 24.60%
• 6M: 24.41%
• 1Y: 25.40%
• 3Y*: 27.99%
• 5Y*: 19.91%
• 10Y*: 11.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPI vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MLPI Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF	17.58%	0.56%
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	24.60%	2.26%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPI and ENFR is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2025	0.90

Return for Risk

MLPI vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENFR

ENFR Risk / Return Rank: 50
ENFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
ENFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
ENFR Omega Ratio Rank: 47
ENFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
ENFR Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPI vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MLPI	ENFR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.75	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.04	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.49	0.34	+3.14

Drawdowns

MLPI vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPI drawdown since its inception was -5.38%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPI and ENFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLPI	ENFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.38%	-68.28%	+62.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.64%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.58%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.29%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-62.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.84%	-4.95%	+1.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.27%	-15.98%	+14.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.16%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MLPI	ENFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.18%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.47%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.05%	14.64%	-1.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.05%	19.30%	-6.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.05%	24.69%	-11.64%

MLPI vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

MLPI vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison

MLPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.04%, more than ENFR's 4.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	4.03%	4.77%	4.41%	5.48%	5.23%	7.86%	7.57%	5.81%	3.98%	2.98%	3.31%	3.34%
MLPI Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF	6.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MLPI and ENFR in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, MLPI and ENFR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, MLPI or ENFR?

On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MLPI or ENFR?

ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for MLPI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MLPI or ENFR?

MLPI has the higher dividend yield at 6.04%, compared with 4.03% for ENFR.

What is the main difference between MLPI and ENFR?

They also come from different issuers: Neos and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for MLPI and 0.35% for ENFR.