MLPI vs. CSHI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MLPI (Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF) and CSHI (Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MLPI is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Neos, while CSHI is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the NONE. MLPI is actively managed, while CSHI is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. MLPI charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for CSHI.

Performance

MLPI vs. CSHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI) and Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPI achieves a 17.58% return, which is significantly higher than CSHI's 2.26% return.

MLPI

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -3.13%
• YTD: 17.58%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSHI

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 2.26%
• 6M: 2.59%
• 1Y: 5.25%
• 3Y*: 5.45%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPI vs. CSHI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MLPI Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF	17.58%	0.56%
CSHI Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF	2.26%	0.18%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPI and CSHI is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2025	-0.11

Return for Risk

MLPI vs. CSHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSHI

CSHI Risk / Return Rank: 99
CSHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CSHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CSHI Omega Ratio Rank: 99
CSHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
CSHI Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPI vs. CSHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI) and Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MLPI	CSHI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	6.16	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.49	4.18	-0.70

Drawdowns

MLPI vs. CSHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPI drawdown since its inception was -5.38%, which is greater than CSHI's maximum drawdown of -1.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPI and CSHI.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLPI	CSHI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.38%	-1.69%	-3.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.18%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-1.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.84%	0.00%	-3.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.27%	-0.03%	-1.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.03%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MLPI	CSHI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.11%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.52%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.05%	0.86%	+12.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.05%	1.32%	+11.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.05%	1.32%	+11.73%

MLPI vs. CSHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHI's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

MLPI vs. CSHI - Dividend Comparison

MLPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.04%, more than CSHI's 4.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CSHI Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF	4.90%	5.11%	5.72%	6.15%	1.52%
MLPI Neos MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF	6.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MLPI and CSHI in my portfolio?

MLPI and CSHI have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MLPI or CSHI?

On fees, CSHI is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MLPI or CSHI?

CSHI is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for MLPI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MLPI or CSHI?

MLPI has the higher dividend yield at 6.04%, compared with 4.90% for CSHI.

What is the main difference between MLPI and CSHI?

MLPI is categorized as Energy Equities, while CSHI is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for MLPI and 0.38% for CSHI.