MLPB vs. FBGX
MLPB (ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B) and FBGX (UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - MLPB is a MLPs fund tracking the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index, while FBGX is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index (200%). Both are passively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MLPB charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for FBGX.
Performance
MLPB vs. FBGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MLPB
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -0.42%
- YTD
- 19.72%
- 6M
- 18.24%
- 1Y
- 20.60%
- 3Y*
- 22.21%
- 5Y*
- 19.42%
- 10Y*
- 10.20%
FBGX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MLPB vs. FBGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPB ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B | 19.72% | 7.40% | 25.53% | 22.01% | 30.22% | 39.42% | -30.80% | 5.69% | -8.79% | -9.71% |
FBGX UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 35.73% | 83.74% | -56.41% | 57.04% | 65.79% | 75.84% | -16.58% | 64.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLPB and FBGX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015 | 0.21 |
The correlation between MLPB and FBGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (3 years) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLPB vs. FBGX — Risk / Return Rank
MLPB
FBGX
MLPB vs. FBGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB) and UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLPB | FBGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.60 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLPB | FBGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | — | — |
Drawdowns
MLPB vs. FBGX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLPB | FBGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.69% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.83% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | — | — |
Volatility
MLPB vs. FBGX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLPB | FBGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.40% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.05% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.51% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.03% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.11% | — | — |
MLPB vs. FBGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLPB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGX's 1.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
MLPB vs. FBGX - Dividend Comparison
MLPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%, while FBGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBGX UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MLPB ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B | 5.85% | 6.51% | 5.95% | 6.37% | 6.00% | 6.98% | 11.93% | 7.98% | 8.11% | 7.23% | 6.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MLPB and FBGX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MLPB is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MLPB is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for FBGX.
MLPB has the higher dividend yield at 5.85%, compared with 0.00% for FBGX.
MLPB is categorized as MLPs, while FBGX is Leveraged Equities. MLPB tracks Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index, while FBGX tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index (200%). Their fees differ too: 0.85% for MLPB and 1.29% for FBGX.
Find the right allocation for MLPB and FBGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer