PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLPB vs. FBGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLPB vs. FBGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB) and UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MLPB

1D
-0.05%
1M
-0.42%
YTD
19.72%
6M
18.24%
1Y
20.60%
3Y*
22.21%
5Y*
19.42%
10Y*
10.20%

FBGX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPB vs. FBGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLPB
ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B
19.72%7.40%25.53%22.01%30.22%39.42%-30.80%5.69%-8.79%-9.71%
FBGX
UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN
0.00%0.00%35.73%83.74%-56.41%57.04%65.79%75.84%-16.58%64.01%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPB and FBGX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015

0.21

The correlation between MLPB and FBGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (3 years) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLPB vs. FBGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPB
MLPB Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
MLPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPB Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPB Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

FBGX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPB vs. FBGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB) and UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLPBFBGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.60

MLPB vs. FBGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLPBFBGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

Drawdowns

MLPB vs. FBGX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPBFBGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-71.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

Volatility

MLPB vs. FBGX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPBFBGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.11%

MLPB vs. FBGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPB has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGX's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLPB vs. FBGX - Dividend Comparison

MLPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%, while FBGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FBGX
UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MLPB
ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B
5.85%6.51%5.95%6.37%6.00%6.98%11.93%7.98%8.11%7.23%6.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLPB and FBGX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MLPB is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MLPB is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for FBGX.

MLPB has the higher dividend yield at 5.85%, compared with 0.00% for FBGX.

MLPB is categorized as MLPs, while FBGX is Leveraged Equities. MLPB tracks Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index, while FBGX tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index (200%). Their fees differ too: 0.85% for MLPB and 1.29% for FBGX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLPB and FBGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer