MLOZX vs. PGJZX
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX) and PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund (PGJZX).
MLOZX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on Dec 19, 2013. PGJZX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Sep 24, 2013.
Performance
MLOZX vs. PGJZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MLOZX vs. PGJZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLOZX Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. | 28.28% | 17.35% | 12.16% | 10.49% | 21.10% | 39.09% | -26.70% | 12.62% | -13.43% | 0.33% |
PGJZX PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund | 8.87% | 18.41% | 17.13% | 5.85% | -7.82% | 15.06% | 1.98% | 28.89% | -8.57% | 18.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLOZX achieves a 28.28% return, which is significantly higher than PGJZX's 8.87% return. Over the past 10 years, MLOZX has outperformed PGJZX with an annualized return of 11.92%, while PGJZX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.59% annualized return.
MLOZX
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 5.97%
- YTD
- 28.28%
- 6M
- 32.61%
- 1Y
- 50.15%
- 3Y*
- 22.84%
- 5Y*
- 21.07%
- 10Y*
- 11.92%
PGJZX
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- -3.65%
- YTD
- 8.87%
- 6M
- 10.30%
- 1Y
- 23.38%
- 3Y*
- 16.26%
- 5Y*
- 11.00%
- 10Y*
- 9.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MLOZX vs. PGJZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLOZX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than PGJZX's 1.17% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MLOZX vs. PGJZX — Risk / Return Rank
MLOZX
PGJZX
MLOZX vs. PGJZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX) and PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund (PGJZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLOZX | PGJZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.59 | 1.92 | +0.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.10 | 2.47 | +0.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.38 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.14 | 3.11 | +0.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.97 | 12.57 | +1.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLOZX | PGJZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59 | 1.92 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.16 | 0.78 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.61 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.55 | -0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between MLOZX and PGJZX is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MLOZX vs. PGJZX - Dividend Comparison
MLOZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than PGJZX's 6.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLOZX Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. | 1.09% | 1.71% | 10.24% | 4.61% | 3.66% | 3.08% | 6.57% | 6.21% | 4.44% | 3.86% | 3.72% | 6.05% |
PGJZX PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund | 6.60% | 7.18% | 9.95% | 1.59% | 3.30% | 7.77% | 1.17% | 1.58% | 2.13% | 1.35% | 1.71% | 1.42% |
Drawdowns
MLOZX vs. PGJZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLOZX drawdown since its inception was -72.01%, which is greater than PGJZX's maximum drawdown of -36.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLOZX and PGJZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLOZX | PGJZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.01% | -36.64% | -35.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.08% | -7.74% | -8.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.84% | -20.56% | -0.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.94% | -36.64% | -28.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -4.13% | +3.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.91% | -5.66% | -15.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.62% | 1.91% | +1.71% |
Volatility
MLOZX vs. PGJZX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX) is 4.27%, while PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund (PGJZX) has a volatility of 4.65%. This indicates that MLOZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PGJZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MLOZX | PGJZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.27% | 4.65% | -0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.97% | 7.49% | +3.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.98% | 12.49% | +7.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.26% | 14.22% | +4.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.16% | 15.73% | +8.43% |