PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLLIX vs. URINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MLLIX vs. URINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Lifetime Income Fund (MLLIX) and USAA Target Retirement Income Fund (URINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MLLIX vs. URINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLLIX
MFS Lifetime Income Fund
-1.02%9.32%5.62%9.12%-11.99%6.63%10.06%13.91%-2.37%8.24%
URINX
USAA Target Retirement Income Fund
-0.45%12.36%6.66%10.79%-10.38%6.47%8.74%11.72%-3.00%8.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLLIX achieves a -1.02% return, which is significantly lower than URINX's -0.45% return. Over the past 10 years, MLLIX has underperformed URINX with an annualized return of 4.78%, while URINX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.35% annualized return.


MLLIX

1D
0.25%
1M
-3.62%
YTD
-1.02%
6M
0.19%
1Y
6.55%
3Y*
6.42%
5Y*
3.11%
10Y*
4.78%

URINX

1D
0.09%
1M
-3.83%
YTD
-0.45%
6M
1.45%
1Y
9.91%
3Y*
8.56%
5Y*
4.40%
10Y*
5.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MLLIX vs. URINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLLIX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than URINX's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

MLLIX vs. URINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLLIX
MLLIX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
MLLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
MLLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

URINX
URINX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
URINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
URINX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
URINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
URINX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLLIX vs. URINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Lifetime Income Fund (MLLIX) and USAA Target Retirement Income Fund (URINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLLIXURINXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.37

1.66

-0.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.91

2.35

-0.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.34

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

2.20

-0.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.91

9.70

-2.79

MLLIX vs. URINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLLIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the URINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLLIX and URINX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLLIXURINXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

1.66

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.71

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.93

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

1.10

-0.27

Correlation

The correlation between MLLIX and URINX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

MLLIX vs. URINX - Dividend Comparison

MLLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%, less than URINX's 6.14% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLLIX
MFS Lifetime Income Fund
5.75%6.01%6.26%3.70%3.92%6.12%3.18%3.80%4.20%3.56%4.21%2.51%
URINX
USAA Target Retirement Income Fund
6.14%6.07%4.22%3.48%6.63%6.66%3.97%6.37%6.11%5.68%3.34%4.54%

Drawdowns

MLLIX vs. URINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLLIX drawdown since its inception was -17.32%, which is greater than URINX's maximum drawdown of -15.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLLIX and URINX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MLLIXURINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.32%

-15.27%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.93%

-4.41%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.08%

-15.27%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.08%

-15.27%

-0.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.62%

-3.83%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.17%

-1.93%

-0.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

1.00%

-0.01%

Volatility

MLLIX vs. URINX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Lifetime Income Fund (MLLIX) is 1.76%, while USAA Target Retirement Income Fund (URINX) has a volatility of 2.30%. This indicates that MLLIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MLLIXURINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.76%

2.30%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.03%

3.69%

-0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.15%

5.99%

-0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.87%

6.22%

-0.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.67%

5.78%

-0.11%