MLAAX vs. MUBFX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

MLAAX (MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund) and MUBFX (MainStay WMC Value Fund) are both mutual funds - MLAAX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by New York Life, while MUBFX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by New York Life. Over the past 10 years, MLAAX returned 17.26%/yr vs 13.06%/yr for MUBFX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MLAAX charges 0.93%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for MUBFX.

Performance

MLAAX vs. MUBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund (MLAAX) and MainStay WMC Value Fund (MUBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLAAX achieves a 6.03% return, which is significantly lower than MUBFX's 7.39% return. Over the past 10 years, MLAAX has outperformed MUBFX with an annualized return of 17.26%, while MUBFX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.06% annualized return.

MLAAX

• 1D: 1.86%
• 1M: 3.10%
• YTD: 6.03%
• 6M: 5.19%
• 1Y: 15.52%
• 3Y*: 21.73%
• 5Y*: 11.84%
• 10Y*: 17.26%

MUBFX

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: -0.33%
• YTD: 7.39%
• 6M: 6.73%
• 1Y: 19.72%
• 3Y*: 13.78%
• 5Y*: 10.06%
• 10Y*: 13.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLAAX vs. MUBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MLAAX MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund	6.03%	14.20%	28.95%	43.10%	-31.51%	25.00%	36.95%	33.18%	3.81%	32.19%
MUBFX MainStay WMC Value Fund	7.39%	14.74%	10.72%	9.62%	-4.54%	28.60%	13.62%	31.67%	-6.89%	22.71%

Correlation

The correlation between MLAAX and MUBFX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 1995	0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between MLAAX and MUBFX has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

MLAAX vs. MUBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLAAX

MLAAX Risk / Return Rank: 10
MLAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
MLAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
MLAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
MLAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
MLAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8

MUBFX

MUBFX Risk / Return Rank: 53
MUBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
MUBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
MUBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
MUBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
MUBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLAAX vs. MUBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund (MLAAX) and MainStay WMC Value Fund (MUBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MLAAX	MUBFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.86	1.86	-1.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.27	2.65	-1.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.33	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.75	3.00	-2.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.18	11.42	-9.24

MLAAX vs. MUBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLAAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the MUBFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLAAX and MUBFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MLAAX vs. MUBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLAAX drawdown since its inception was -83.01%, which is greater than MUBFX's maximum drawdown of -53.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLAAX and MUBFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLAAX	MUBFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.01%	-53.31%	-29.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.28%	-6.67%	-13.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.43%	-14.19%	-21.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.36%	-15.61%	-23.75%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.36%	-39.31%	-0.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.27%	-1.72%	-2.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.75%	-6.16%	-32.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.98%	1.75%	+5.23%

Volatility

MLAAX vs. MUBFX - Volatility Comparison

MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund (MLAAX) has a higher volatility of 7.73% compared to MainStay WMC Value Fund (MUBFX) at 2.99%. This indicates that MLAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MUBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MLAAX	MUBFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.73%	2.99%	+4.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.10%	7.81%	+6.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.77%	10.76%	+7.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.74%	14.81%	+10.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.79%	17.91%	+7.88%

MLAAX vs. MUBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLAAX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than MUBFX's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

MLAAX vs. MUBFX - Dividend Comparison

MLAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.99%, more than MUBFX's 6.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MLAAX MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund	22.99%	24.37%	22.54%	10.59%	14.95%	26.64%	5.40%	11.55%	23.59%	17.20%	13.18%	13.61%
MUBFX MainStay WMC Value Fund	6.87%	7.38%	5.24%	4.49%	5.82%	81.14%	3.79%	8.43%	11.90%	11.15%	2.53%	19.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MLAAX and MUBFX in my portfolio?

MLAAX and MUBFX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MLAAX or MUBFX?

MLAAX has higher volatility (7.73%) compared to MUBFX (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLAAX dropped -83.01% vs MUBFX's -53.31%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MUBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.