PortfoliosLab logo
MLAAX vs. LGLIX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MLAAX and LGLIX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

MLAAX vs. LGLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund (MLAAX) and Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MLAAX:

0.62

LGLIX:

0.66

Sortino Ratio

MLAAX:

1.00

LGLIX:

1.09

Omega Ratio

MLAAX:

1.14

LGLIX:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

MLAAX:

0.69

LGLIX:

0.72

Martin Ratio

MLAAX:

2.35

LGLIX:

2.15

Ulcer Index

MLAAX:

6.67%

LGLIX:

9.73%

Daily Std Dev

MLAAX:

25.83%

LGLIX:

31.12%

Max Drawdown

MLAAX:

-48.85%

LGLIX:

-45.95%

Current Drawdown

MLAAX:

-2.48%

LGLIX:

-8.88%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLAAX achieves a 2.83% return, which is significantly higher than LGLIX's -0.68% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MLAAX having a 14.81% annualized return and LGLIX not far ahead at 15.06%.


MLAAX

YTD

2.83%

1M

10.21%

6M

2.28%

1Y

15.87%

3Y*

20.93%

5Y*

15.68%

10Y*

14.81%

LGLIX

YTD

-0.68%

1M

9.89%

6M

-1.04%

1Y

20.34%

3Y*

17.48%

5Y*

14.24%

10Y*

15.06%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund

MLAAX vs. LGLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLAAX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than LGLIX's 0.64% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MLAAX vs. LGLIX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLAAX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MLAAX is 5353
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MLAAX is 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MLAAX is 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MLAAX is 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MLAAX is 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MLAAX is 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

LGLIX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LGLIX is 5656
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LGLIX is 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LGLIX is 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LGLIX is 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LGLIX is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LGLIX is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MLAAX vs. LGLIX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund (MLAAX) and Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MLAAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is comparable to the LGLIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLAAX and LGLIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

MLAAX vs. LGLIX - Dividend Comparison

MLAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.91%, while LGLIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MLAAX
MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund
21.91%22.53%10.61%14.96%26.64%5.41%11.55%23.59%17.20%13.18%13.61%10.53%
LGLIX
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%23.83%9.27%9.03%19.82%6.46%0.00%4.84%5.82%

Drawdowns

MLAAX vs. LGLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLAAX drawdown since its inception was -48.85%, which is greater than LGLIX's maximum drawdown of -45.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLAAX and LGLIX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

MLAAX vs. LGLIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund (MLAAX) is 5.66%, while Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) has a volatility of 5.96%. This indicates that MLAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LGLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...