MUBFX vs. MHCAX
Compare and contrast key facts about MainStay WMC Value Fund (MUBFX) and MainStay MacKay High Yield Corporate Bond Fund Class A (MHCAX).
MUBFX is managed by New York Life. It was launched on Jan 21, 1971. MHCAX is managed by New York Life. It was launched on May 1, 1986.
Performance
MUBFX vs. MHCAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MUBFX vs. MHCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUBFX MainStay WMC Value Fund | -0.12% | 14.74% | 10.72% | 9.62% | -4.54% | 28.60% | 13.62% | 31.67% | -6.89% | 22.71% |
MHCAX MainStay MacKay High Yield Corporate Bond Fund Class A | -0.62% | 6.44% | 6.90% | 11.27% | 42.57% | 5.10% | 4.82% | 12.76% | -1.92% | 6.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MUBFX achieves a -0.12% return, which is significantly higher than MHCAX's -0.62% return. Over the past 10 years, MUBFX has outperformed MHCAX with an annualized return of 12.39%, while MHCAX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.09% annualized return.
MUBFX
- 1D
- 1.89%
- 1M
- -4.07%
- YTD
- -0.12%
- 6M
- 4.16%
- 1Y
- 11.87%
- 3Y*
- 12.11%
- 5Y*
- 9.13%
- 10Y*
- 12.39%
MHCAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.35%
- YTD
- -0.62%
- 6M
- 0.34%
- 1Y
- 4.66%
- 3Y*
- 6.70%
- 5Y*
- 13.24%
- 10Y*
- 10.09%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MUBFX vs. MHCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MUBFX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than MHCAX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MUBFX vs. MHCAX — Risk / Return Rank
MUBFX
MHCAX
MUBFX vs. MHCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay WMC Value Fund (MUBFX) and MainStay MacKay High Yield Corporate Bond Fund Class A (MHCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MUBFX | MHCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.76 | 1.64 | -0.88 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.14 | 2.19 | -1.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.42 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | 1.58 | -0.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.51 | 7.50 | -2.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MUBFX | MHCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 | 1.64 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.53 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.56 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.77 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between MUBFX and MHCAX is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MUBFX vs. MHCAX - Dividend Comparison
MUBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.39%, more than MHCAX's 5.62% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUBFX MainStay WMC Value Fund | 7.39% | 7.38% | 5.24% | 4.49% | 5.82% | 81.14% | 3.79% | 8.43% | 11.90% | 11.15% | 2.53% | 19.99% |
MHCAX MainStay MacKay High Yield Corporate Bond Fund Class A | 5.62% | 6.06% | 5.90% | 5.56% | 40.91% | 5.00% | 5.52% | 5.58% | 5.94% | 6.20% | 5.69% | 6.72% |
Drawdowns
MUBFX vs. MHCAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MUBFX drawdown since its inception was -53.31%, which is greater than MHCAX's maximum drawdown of -29.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUBFX and MHCAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MUBFX | MHCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.31% | -29.62% | -23.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.17% | -2.89% | -8.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.61% | -11.74% | -3.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.31% | -18.98% | -20.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.82% | -1.48% | -3.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.19% | -2.15% | -4.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.57% | 0.61% | +1.96% |
Volatility
MUBFX vs. MHCAX - Volatility Comparison
MainStay WMC Value Fund (MUBFX) has a higher volatility of 3.81% compared to MainStay MacKay High Yield Corporate Bond Fund Class A (MHCAX) at 0.95%. This indicates that MUBFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MHCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MUBFX | MHCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.81% | 0.95% | +2.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.25% | 1.63% | +6.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.70% | 2.99% | +12.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.87% | 25.35% | -10.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.92% | 18.23% | -0.31% |