MLAAX vs. FRVLX
Compare and contrast key facts about MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund (MLAAX) and Franklin Small Cap Value Fund (FRVLX).
MLAAX is managed by New York Life. It was launched on Jul 3, 1995. FRVLX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Mar 11, 1996.
Performance
MLAAX vs. FRVLX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MLAAX vs. FRVLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLAAX MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund | -15.36% | 14.20% | 28.95% | 43.10% | -31.51% | 25.00% | 36.95% | 33.18% | 3.81% | 32.19% |
FRVLX Franklin Small Cap Value Fund | 1.63% | 7.36% | 13.16% | 12.81% | -10.25% | 22.51% | 5.45% | 26.08% | -12.92% | 9.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLAAX achieves a -15.36% return, which is significantly lower than FRVLX's 1.63% return. Over the past 10 years, MLAAX has outperformed FRVLX with an annualized return of 14.62%, while FRVLX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.09% annualized return.
MLAAX
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- -9.71%
- YTD
- -15.36%
- 6M
- -15.31%
- 1Y
- 5.38%
- 3Y*
- 17.08%
- 5Y*
- 8.65%
- 10Y*
- 14.62%
FRVLX
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -9.06%
- YTD
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 4.27%
- 1Y
- 16.91%
- 3Y*
- 10.90%
- 5Y*
- 5.00%
- 10Y*
- 9.09%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MLAAX vs. FRVLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLAAX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is lower than FRVLX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MLAAX vs. FRVLX — Risk / Return Rank
MLAAX
FRVLX
MLAAX vs. FRVLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund (MLAAX) and Franklin Small Cap Value Fund (FRVLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLAAX | FRVLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.23 | 0.72 | -0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.50 | 1.16 | -0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.16 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.09 | 0.92 | -0.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.28 | 3.20 | -2.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLAAX | FRVLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 | 0.72 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.23 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.40 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.41 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between MLAAX and FRVLX is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MLAAX vs. FRVLX - Dividend Comparison
MLAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.79%, more than FRVLX's 7.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLAAX MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund | 28.79% | 24.37% | 22.54% | 10.59% | 14.95% | 26.64% | 5.40% | 11.55% | 23.59% | 17.20% | 13.18% | 13.61% |
FRVLX Franklin Small Cap Value Fund | 7.86% | 7.99% | 8.45% | 4.54% | 3.21% | 7.55% | 2.20% | 6.31% | 18.48% | 8.06% | 4.76% | 11.04% |
Drawdowns
MLAAX vs. FRVLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLAAX drawdown since its inception was -83.01%, which is greater than FRVLX's maximum drawdown of -60.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLAAX and FRVLX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLAAX | FRVLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.01% | -60.27% | -22.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.28% | -14.98% | -5.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.36% | -25.09% | -14.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.36% | -44.10% | +4.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.58% | -11.71% | -11.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.96% | -10.36% | -28.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.35% | 4.31% | +2.04% |
Volatility
MLAAX vs. FRVLX - Volatility Comparison
MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund (MLAAX) and Franklin Small Cap Value Fund (FRVLX) have volatilities of 5.76% and 5.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MLAAX | FRVLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.76% | 5.75% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.52% | 13.02% | -0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.74% | 23.26% | -0.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.55% | 21.54% | +4.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.64% | 22.74% | +2.90% |