MLAAX vs. COST

In the year-to-date period, MLAAX achieves a 9.90% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 45.70% return. Over the past 10 years, MLAAX has underperformed COST with an annualized return of -0.32%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 23.52% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund (MLAAX) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current MLAAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLAAX and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

MLAAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%.

The maximum MLAAX drawdown since its inception was -55.55%, roughly equal to the maximum COST drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLAAX and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund (MLAAX) has a higher volatility of 20.95% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 3.89%. This indicates that MLAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.