MLAAX vs. MBAIX
Compare and contrast key facts about MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund (MLAAX) and MainStay Balanced Fund (MBAIX).
MLAAX is managed by New York Life. It was launched on Jul 3, 1995. MBAIX is managed by New York Life. It was launched on Apr 30, 1989.
Performance
MLAAX vs. MBAIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MLAAX vs. MBAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLAAX MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund | -15.36% | 14.20% | 28.95% | 43.10% | -31.51% | 25.00% | 36.95% | 33.18% | 3.81% | 32.19% |
MBAIX MainStay Balanced Fund | -1.36% | 11.38% | 7.59% | 7.56% | -5.80% | 17.13% | 7.73% | 19.28% | -7.53% | 9.87% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLAAX achieves a -15.36% return, which is significantly lower than MBAIX's -1.36% return. Over the past 10 years, MLAAX has outperformed MBAIX with an annualized return of 14.62%, while MBAIX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.95% annualized return.
MLAAX
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- -9.71%
- YTD
- -15.36%
- 6M
- -15.31%
- 1Y
- 5.38%
- 3Y*
- 17.08%
- 5Y*
- 8.65%
- 10Y*
- 14.62%
MBAIX
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -4.42%
- YTD
- -1.36%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- 7.32%
- 3Y*
- 8.24%
- 5Y*
- 5.50%
- 10Y*
- 6.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MLAAX vs. MBAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLAAX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than MBAIX's 0.81% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MLAAX vs. MBAIX — Risk / Return Rank
MLAAX
MBAIX
MLAAX vs. MBAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund (MLAAX) and MainStay Balanced Fund (MBAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLAAX | MBAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.23 | 0.84 | -0.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.50 | 1.22 | -0.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.17 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.09 | 1.03 | -0.95 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.28 | 4.45 | -4.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLAAX | MBAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 | 0.84 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.59 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.66 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.78 | -0.58 |
Correlation
The correlation between MLAAX and MBAIX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MLAAX vs. MBAIX - Dividend Comparison
MLAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.79%, more than MBAIX's 6.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLAAX MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund | 28.79% | 24.37% | 22.54% | 10.59% | 14.95% | 26.64% | 5.40% | 11.55% | 23.59% | 17.20% | 13.18% | 13.61% |
MBAIX MainStay Balanced Fund | 6.19% | 6.95% | 6.14% | 2.27% | 1.86% | 23.51% | 2.24% | 6.04% | 9.37% | 7.05% | 2.94% | 6.93% |
Drawdowns
MLAAX vs. MBAIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLAAX drawdown since its inception was -83.01%, which is greater than MBAIX's maximum drawdown of -39.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLAAX and MBAIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLAAX | MBAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.01% | -39.74% | -43.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.28% | -6.84% | -13.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.36% | -13.19% | -26.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.36% | -25.87% | -13.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.58% | -4.53% | -19.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.96% | -3.58% | -35.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.35% | 1.59% | +4.76% |
Volatility
MLAAX vs. MBAIX - Volatility Comparison
MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund (MLAAX) has a higher volatility of 5.76% compared to MainStay Balanced Fund (MBAIX) at 2.25%. This indicates that MLAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MLAAX | MBAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.76% | 2.25% | +3.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.52% | 5.22% | +7.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.74% | 9.50% | +13.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.55% | 9.40% | +16.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.64% | 10.60% | +15.04% |