MLAAX vs. FBAKX
Compare and contrast key facts about MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund (MLAAX) and Fidelity Balanced Fund Class K (FBAKX).
MLAAX is managed by New York Life. It was launched on Jul 3, 1995. FBAKX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 6, 1986.
Performance
MLAAX vs. FBAKX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MLAAX vs. FBAKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLAAX MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund | -15.36% | 14.20% | 28.95% | 43.10% | -31.51% | 25.00% | 36.95% | 33.18% | 3.81% | 32.19% |
FBAKX Fidelity Balanced Fund Class K | -3.70% | 15.19% | 16.17% | 20.40% | -18.22% | 18.40% | 22.51% | 24.50% | -3.89% | 16.62% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLAAX achieves a -15.36% return, which is significantly lower than FBAKX's -3.70% return. Over the past 10 years, MLAAX has outperformed FBAKX with an annualized return of 14.62%, while FBAKX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.60% annualized return.
MLAAX
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- -9.71%
- YTD
- -15.36%
- 6M
- -15.31%
- 1Y
- 5.38%
- 3Y*
- 17.08%
- 5Y*
- 8.65%
- 10Y*
- 14.62%
FBAKX
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -5.81%
- YTD
- -3.70%
- 6M
- -0.90%
- 1Y
- 14.05%
- 3Y*
- 12.99%
- 5Y*
- 7.52%
- 10Y*
- 10.60%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MLAAX vs. FBAKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLAAX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than FBAKX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MLAAX vs. FBAKX — Risk / Return Rank
MLAAX
FBAKX
MLAAX vs. FBAKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund (MLAAX) and Fidelity Balanced Fund Class K (FBAKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLAAX | FBAKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.23 | 1.24 | -1.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.50 | 1.79 | -1.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.27 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.09 | 1.59 | -1.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.28 | 7.42 | -7.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLAAX | FBAKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 | 1.24 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.62 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.84 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.63 | -0.43 |
Correlation
The correlation between MLAAX and FBAKX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MLAAX vs. FBAKX - Dividend Comparison
MLAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.79%, more than FBAKX's 5.94% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLAAX MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund | 28.79% | 24.37% | 22.54% | 10.59% | 14.95% | 26.64% | 5.40% | 11.55% | 23.59% | 17.20% | 13.18% | 13.61% |
FBAKX Fidelity Balanced Fund Class K | 5.94% | 5.72% | 5.74% | 2.35% | 8.15% | 9.74% | 5.97% | 4.31% | 11.09% | 7.98% | 3.16% | 7.79% |
Drawdowns
MLAAX vs. FBAKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLAAX drawdown since its inception was -83.01%, which is greater than FBAKX's maximum drawdown of -41.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLAAX and FBAKX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLAAX | FBAKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.01% | -41.40% | -41.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.28% | -8.12% | -12.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.36% | -22.84% | -16.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.36% | -26.68% | -12.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.58% | -6.47% | -17.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.96% | -5.18% | -33.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.35% | 1.74% | +4.61% |
Volatility
MLAAX vs. FBAKX - Volatility Comparison
MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund (MLAAX) has a higher volatility of 5.76% compared to Fidelity Balanced Fund Class K (FBAKX) at 3.48%. This indicates that MLAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBAKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MLAAX | FBAKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.76% | 3.48% | +2.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.52% | 6.47% | +6.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.74% | 11.79% | +10.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.55% | 12.16% | +13.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.64% | 12.73% | +12.91% |