MLAAX vs. EPSYX
Compare and contrast key facts about MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund (MLAAX) and MainStay Epoch Global Equity Yield Fund (EPSYX).
MLAAX is managed by New York Life. It was launched on Jul 3, 1995. EPSYX is managed by New York Life. It was launched on Dec 26, 2005.
Performance
MLAAX vs. EPSYX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MLAAX vs. EPSYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLAAX MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund | -12.29% | 14.20% | 28.95% | 43.10% | -31.51% | 25.00% | 36.95% | 33.18% | 3.81% | 32.19% |
EPSYX MainStay Epoch Global Equity Yield Fund | 4.17% | 22.09% | 15.38% | 12.50% | -5.37% | 17.40% | -1.38% | 23.19% | -9.23% | 16.31% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLAAX achieves a -12.29% return, which is significantly lower than EPSYX's 4.17% return. Over the past 10 years, MLAAX has outperformed EPSYX with an annualized return of 15.03%, while EPSYX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.14% annualized return.
MLAAX
- 1D
- 3.63%
- 1M
- -6.43%
- YTD
- -12.29%
- 6M
- -12.72%
- 1Y
- 8.34%
- 3Y*
- 18.48%
- 5Y*
- 8.98%
- 10Y*
- 15.03%
EPSYX
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- -5.30%
- YTD
- 4.17%
- 6M
- 6.91%
- 1Y
- 22.62%
- 3Y*
- 17.17%
- 5Y*
- 11.16%
- 10Y*
- 9.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MLAAX vs. EPSYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLAAX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than EPSYX's 0.84% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MLAAX vs. EPSYX — Risk / Return Rank
MLAAX
EPSYX
MLAAX vs. EPSYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund (MLAAX) and MainStay Epoch Global Equity Yield Fund (EPSYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLAAX | EPSYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.40 | 1.65 | -1.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.75 | 2.22 | -1.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.35 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.30 | 2.06 | -1.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.97 | 9.60 | -8.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLAAX | EPSYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 | 1.65 | -1.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.86 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.62 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.49 | -0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between MLAAX and EPSYX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MLAAX vs. EPSYX - Dividend Comparison
MLAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.79%, more than EPSYX's 7.07% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLAAX MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund | 27.79% | 24.37% | 22.54% | 10.59% | 14.95% | 26.64% | 5.40% | 11.55% | 23.59% | 17.20% | 13.18% | 13.61% |
EPSYX MainStay Epoch Global Equity Yield Fund | 7.07% | 8.24% | 10.13% | 2.71% | 2.64% | 2.66% | 2.74% | 6.87% | 9.87% | 2.24% | 3.18% | 9.65% |
Drawdowns
MLAAX vs. EPSYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLAAX drawdown since its inception was -83.01%, which is greater than EPSYX's maximum drawdown of -48.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLAAX and EPSYX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLAAX | EPSYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.01% | -48.92% | -34.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.28% | -10.78% | -9.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.36% | -18.92% | -20.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.36% | -36.35% | -3.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.81% | -5.68% | -15.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.96% | -6.96% | -32.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.37% | 2.32% | +4.05% |
Volatility
MLAAX vs. EPSYX - Volatility Comparison
MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund (MLAAX) has a higher volatility of 7.04% compared to MainStay Epoch Global Equity Yield Fund (EPSYX) at 4.17%. This indicates that MLAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EPSYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MLAAX | EPSYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.04% | 4.17% | +2.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.04% | 7.68% | +5.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.97% | 13.90% | +9.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.59% | 12.99% | +12.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.66% | 14.85% | +10.81% |