PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ML.PA vs. ENOG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ML.PA vs. ENOG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions (ML.PA) and Energean Oil & Gas plc (ENOG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ML.PA is traded in EUR, while ENOG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ENOG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ML.PA achieves a 22.39% return, which is significantly higher than ENOG.L's -12.19% return.


ML.PA

1D
2.79%
1M
9.78%
YTD
22.39%
6M
23.52%
1Y
6.08%
3Y*
10.25%
5Y*
7.11%
10Y*
13.92%

ENOG.L

1D
-1.21%
1M
-13.80%
YTD
-12.19%
6M
-11.70%
1Y
-2.29%
3Y*
-4.32%
5Y*
5.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ML.PA vs. ENOG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ML.PA
Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions
22.39%-7.35%1.60%30.61%-15.25%48.28%5.31%45.88%-22.61%
ENOG.L
Energean Oil & Gas plc
-12.19%-11.05%13.62%-9.34%51.91%26.26%-26.66%57.44%35.60%

Correlation

The correlation between ML.PA and ENOG.L is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2018

0.15

The correlation between ML.PA and ENOG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ML.PA vs. ENOG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ML.PA
ML.PA Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
ML.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ML.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
ML.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
ML.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
ML.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

ENOG.L
ENOG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
ENOG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENOG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENOG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
ENOG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENOG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ML.PA vs. ENOG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions (ML.PA) and Energean Oil & Gas plc (ENOG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ML.PAENOG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

0.98

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.29

-0.30

+0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.63

-0.75

+1.38

ML.PA vs. ENOG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ML.PA Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is higher than the ENOG.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ML.PA and ENOG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ML.PA vs. ENOG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ML.PA drawdown since its inception was -73.30%, roughly equal to the maximum ENOG.L drawdown of -73.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ML.PA and ENOG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ML.PAENOG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.30%

-73.16%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.52%

-23.94%

+3.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.18%

-34.01%

+4.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.53%

-43.09%

+10.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.03%

-32.52%

+26.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.53%

-19.28%

+4.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.59%

9.76%

-0.17%

Volatility

ML.PA vs. ENOG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions (ML.PA) is 5.26%, while Energean Oil & Gas plc (ENOG.L) has a volatility of 8.39%. This indicates that ML.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENOG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ML.PAENOG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.26%

8.39%

-3.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.74%

22.02%

-5.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.80%

28.77%

-5.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.61%

37.61%

-13.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.62%

46.49%

-19.87%

Dividends

ML.PA vs. ENOG.L - Dividend Comparison

ML.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, less than ENOG.L's 9.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENOG.L
Energean Oil & Gas plc
9.99%10.16%7.89%11.49%4.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ML.PA
Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions
4.16%4.87%4.25%3.85%17.31%6.38%7.62%13.56%16.38%10.87%10.78%11.37%

Financials

ML.PA vs. ENOG.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions and Energean Oil & Gas plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. ML.PA values in EUR, ENOG.L values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


ML.PA and ENOG.L have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ML.PA and ENOG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer